2013
DOI: 10.1109/lcomm.2013.031913.130060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clipping Demapper for LDPC Decoding in Impulsive Channel

Abstract: Abstract-This paper deals with the performance of LowDensity Parity-Check codes in impulsive interference modeled by α-stable random variables. In case of α-stable noise, the optimal inputs of the belief propagation decoder are complex to obtain. We propose to use the simple clipping approach that reduces the impact of large noise values. Our main contribution is to give three different approaches to obtain the parameters of the clipping function and to assess the performance of the decoder. We show that a loo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When y is close to zero, the LLR is almost linear, whereas when y is large enough, the LLR presents a power-law decrease. The presence of these two parts has been used in the literature to propose several LLRs [12,18,[27][28][29] and justifies the proposed piece-wise affine set for the LLRs approximation.…”
Section: Llr Approximation Under Impulsive Noisementioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When y is close to zero, the LLR is almost linear, whereas when y is large enough, the LLR presents a power-law decrease. The presence of these two parts has been used in the literature to propose several LLRs [12,18,[27][28][29] and justifies the proposed piece-wise affine set for the LLRs approximation.…”
Section: Llr Approximation Under Impulsive Noisementioning
confidence: 87%
“…Other examples of piece-wise affine LLR approximations can be found in the literature. A classical solution is the clipping demapper [18] defined as L θ (x) = sgn(x) min(θ 1 |x|, θ 2 ). Nevertheless, other approximations that do not belong to our considered piece-wise affine function can also be found, as for instance the Hole puncher demapper [19] or non-linear approximation like in [8].…”
Section: Llr Approximation and Optimization Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This idea leads to a modification of the LLR function and classical examples are the soft limiter and the hole puncher [66,73,92,100,101]. For small received samples, a linear function is used and for large samples, respectively, a constant value or a zero are used as output of the LLR function.…”
Section: Llr Inspired Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another popular approach to protect against impulsive noise is based on error correction code (ECC) including low-density parity-check codes (LDPC) [23], LDPC convolutional codes [24] and codes turbo codes (TC) [25] for the following two reasons. They can provide results closed to Shannon limit capacity with acceptable complexities and the check relationships of block codes can embody the constraints, which help to suppress the additive noises caused by PLC channels.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%