2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.disc.2016.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clique number of the square of a line graph

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [9], Theorem 1.4 is proved by counting edges in the strong clique which are in the second neighborhood of a vertex v of maximum degree. The crucial part of the argument lies in counting the subset (called D) of edges in the strong clique which are not incident with any neighbor of v (ie, edges whose ends are both at distance exactly two from v).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [9], Theorem 1.4 is proved by counting edges in the strong clique which are in the second neighborhood of a vertex v of maximum degree. The crucial part of the argument lies in counting the subset (called D) of edges in the strong clique which are not incident with any neighbor of v (ie, edges whose ends are both at distance exactly two from v).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent article, Śleszyńska-Nowak [9] gave a new proof of Theorem 1.3. Furthermore, she improved the bound for the general case as follows.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After our result was published on arXiv,Śleszyńska-Nowak [26] found a neat elementary proof that the size of a strong clique is always at most 3 2 Δ(G) 2 for any graph G. Coming back to strong edge colourings, let us note that there are a number of results for special graph classes. The conjecture was verified for maximum degree 3 by Andersen [2], and independently by Horek, Qing and Trotter [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Conjecture 2 remains open, but is closer to being proved than Conjecture 1. The second author proved that x L 2 ðGÞ ð Þ 3 2 D 2 [28], which was improved to 4 3 D 2 by Faron and Postle [14]. There are also sharp results for specific classes of graphs: for bipartite graphs the upper bound is D 2 [16] (sharp for complete bipartite graphs), and for triangle-free graphs it is 5 4 D 2 [3, Theorem 4.1.5] (sharp for blowups of C 5 ).…”
Section: > < >mentioning
confidence: 99%