2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/infocom.2015.7218533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cliques in hyperbolic random graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The IPv4 topology (layer 1) consists of N 1 = 37563 nodes (ASs), and has a power law degree distribution with exponent γ 1 = 2.1, average node degreek 1 = 5.06, and average clusteringc 1 = 0.63 (T 1 = 0.5). 5 The IPv6 topology (layer 2) consists of N 2 = 5162 nodes, has a power law degree distribution with exponent γ 2 = 2.1, average node degreek 2 = 5.21, and average clusteringc 2 = 0.55 (T 2 = 0.5). There are 4819 common nodes in the two Appendix C: k 2(r) in the uncorrelated and maximally correlated cases…”
Section: Appendix A: Real-world Multiplex Network Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The IPv4 topology (layer 1) consists of N 1 = 37563 nodes (ASs), and has a power law degree distribution with exponent γ 1 = 2.1, average node degreek 1 = 5.06, and average clusteringc 1 = 0.63 (T 1 = 0.5). 5 The IPv6 topology (layer 2) consists of N 2 = 5162 nodes, has a power law degree distribution with exponent γ 2 = 2.1, average node degreek 2 = 5.21, and average clusteringc 2 = 0.55 (T 2 = 0.5). There are 4819 common nodes in the two Appendix C: k 2(r) in the uncorrelated and maximally correlated cases…”
Section: Appendix A: Real-world Multiplex Network Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that random geometric graphs in hyperbolic spaces are adequate models for complex networks, as they naturally and simultaneously possess many of their common structural and dynamical characteristics, including heterogeneous distributions of node degrees, strong clustering, and preferential attachment, cf. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. Specifically, the H 2 model [1,2] constructs networks by randomly distributing nodes on a hyperbolic disc of radius R, such that each node i has the polar coordinates, or hidden variables, r i , θ i , and connecting each pair of nodes with a probability that decreases with their hyperbolic distance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the typical number of graphlets, we obtain a similar result, by adding the constraint α i ≤ 1 τ −1 to (47). This results in the optimization problem (like its equivalent version for motifs in (45)) B g,t (H) = max P |S 1 | − |S 2 | − 2E S1 + E S1,S3 + E S1,1 − E S2,1 τ − 1 ,…”
Section: Supplementary Note 4 Graphletsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…For 2 < β < 3, the hyperbolic random graph has a giant component of size Ω(n) [3,4], similar to other scale-free networks like Chung-Lu [10]. Other studied properties include the clique number [14], bootstrap percolation [9]; as well as algorithms for efficient generation of hyperbolic random graphs [24] and efficient embedding of real networks in the hyperbolic plane [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%