1983
DOI: 10.2307/413900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cliticization vs. Inflection: English N'T

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
275
2
10

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 638 publications
(293 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
6
275
2
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The spatial morpheme can appear across different categories, such as index signs, spatially modified signs, as well as verb inflection. According to Zwicky & Pullum (1983), this is a strong argument for a morpheme to be considered a clitic.…”
Section: The Spatial Morphemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatial morpheme can appear across different categories, such as index signs, spatially modified signs, as well as verb inflection. According to Zwicky & Pullum (1983), this is a strong argument for a morpheme to be considered a clitic.…”
Section: The Spatial Morphemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are various tests proposed in the literature to distinguish between these two options. Zwicky (1977) and Zwicky and Pullum (1983) provide several tests. De Haan (1997) gives specific tests to distinguish between clitics and inflectional endings in Frisian.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(the current 3SG being a reformation). Such specialization of individual forms is characteristically found with affixal formations, according to Zwicky & Pullum 1983, and not with those involving clitics, which are syntactically and semantically transparent. Thus, from this evidence, Tsakonian, and by extension, Greek in general, has affixal indicative negation.…”
Section: Dialect Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many linguists have proposed criteria for distinguishing among words, clitics, and affixes (see, for example, Carstairs 1981or Muysken 1981, those put forth recently by Zwicky, in Zwicky 1985, Zwicky 1987, and Zwicky & Pullum 1983, are adopted here. These "Zwicky criteria" present the strongest basis for deciding categorial status, for they are both internally consistent and derivative from the architecture of overall theory of grammar he assumes.…”
Section: Introduction and Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%