2002
DOI: 10.1071/mu01055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cloacal microorganisms and mating systems of four Australian bird species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We expected that if high-testosterone males were mating promiscuously, then they would be accumulating more rare bacteria from their multiple mates and would have more variable bacterial communities. For example, greater variability in cloacal microbial composition in polyandrous females of superb fairywrens (Malarus cyaneus), white-browed scrubwren (Sericornis frontalis) and common lizards (Z. vivipara) was best explained as a result of the sexual transmission of different bacterial strains by multiple mates (Poiani & Gwozdz 2002;White et al 2011). Indeed, sexually transmitted diseases have been postulated as a drivers of mating system evolution (Lombardo 1998;Ashby & Gupta 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We expected that if high-testosterone males were mating promiscuously, then they would be accumulating more rare bacteria from their multiple mates and would have more variable bacterial communities. For example, greater variability in cloacal microbial composition in polyandrous females of superb fairywrens (Malarus cyaneus), white-browed scrubwren (Sericornis frontalis) and common lizards (Z. vivipara) was best explained as a result of the sexual transmission of different bacterial strains by multiple mates (Poiani & Gwozdz 2002;White et al 2011). Indeed, sexually transmitted diseases have been postulated as a drivers of mating system evolution (Lombardo 1998;Ashby & Gupta 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that patterns of transmission are related to the frequency (Gray et al 2001; Wawer et al 2005) and duration of contact (Kraut-Becher & Aral 2003), variation in sexual behavior between individuals and species (i.e., differences in mating systems) may influence the sexual transmission of bacteria (Mitsunaga et al 2005; Poiani & Gwozdz 2002), and thus bacterial communities of relevant reproductive structures, leading to significant inter-specific and inter-individual differences in microbiota of specific anatomical structures. A considerable amount of research, at least in humans, has been devoted to understanding how patterns of sexual contact can modify the risk of pathogen acquisition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study of more than 600 men and women, Manhart and colleagues found that an increase in the number of concurrent sexual partners (=increased promiscuity) was associated with an increased risk for contraction of a sexually transmitted pathogen (Manhart et al 2002). In contrast to the amount of research done in this single species, there has been surprisingly little research done regarding how differences in sexual behavior (i.e., number of partners and patterns of concurrency) affect bacterial (pathogenic and non-pathogenic) community composition in non-model taxa (but see (Poiani & Gwozdz 2002) and (Webberley et al 2002). This is important, as existing data, from a limited number of species, already suggest that large differences in microbiota, may exist (Rivera, Frank, et al 2010b; Spear et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Harmful bacteria, viruses and yeast are known to reside in the cloaca of avian species. The cloaca is the route for faecal as well as semen discharge, giving cloacal microorganisms the potential to be sexually transmitted in birds (Poiani & Wilks 2000a, 2000b, Poiani & Gwozdz 2002, Poiani 2002. Cloacal contact during copulation in birds tends to bias transmission of venereal microorganisms from male to female, although the final level of infection detected in both sexes will be also a function of the number of partners individuals of each sex have and the ability of males and females to clear their body from invading microparasites (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%