2014 44th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks 2014
DOI: 10.1109/dsn.2014.42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clock-RSM: Low-Latency Inter-datacenter State Machine Replication Using Loosely Synchronized Physical Clocks

Abstract: Abstract-This paper proposes Clock-RSM, a new state machine replication protocol that uses loosely synchronized physical clocks to totally order commands for geo-replicated services. Clock-RSM assumes realistic non-uniform latencies among replicas located at different data centers. It provides low-latency linearizable replication by overlapping 1) logging a command at a majority of replicas, 2) determining the stable order of the command from the farthest replica, and 3) notifying the commit of the command to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In worst case, every request may necessitate a consensus run per state change, thus preventing fast network reconfigurations and introducing a bottleneck on control plane, and ultimately data-plane. Although slight variations of Paxos, including the recent RAFT [10] consensus algorithm, were proposed in literature [10]- [12], the general concept and signaling overhead of the algorithm is unchanged.…”
Section: Accept-responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In worst case, every request may necessitate a consensus run per state change, thus preventing fast network reconfigurations and introducing a bottleneck on control plane, and ultimately data-plane. Although slight variations of Paxos, including the recent RAFT [10] consensus algorithm, were proposed in literature [10]- [12], the general concept and signaling overhead of the algorithm is unchanged.…”
Section: Accept-responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some state-machine replication protocols do use physical clock timestamps, but only to improve performance[19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strongly consistent transactional systems. Many systems support geo-replication with consistency guarantees stronger than CC (e.g., Spanner [1], Walter [43], Gemini [44], Lynx [45], Jessy [46], Clock-SRM [47], SDUR [48] and Droopy [49]). These systems require cross-DC coordination to commit transactions, hence they are not always-available [11], [19].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%