2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2012.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clock state estimation with the Kalman-like UFIR algorithm via TIE measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conventionally, we consider all estimates beginning with the first one provided by the UFIR filter on a horizon of N opt = 3500 points. The results confirm a conclusion that was earlier made in [10] and [40]: the UFIR filter is more robust than KF against the GPS time uncertainties and more accurate in clock state estimating. In fact, errors in all of the UFIR estimates (Fig.…”
Section: B Gps-based State Estimation Of Ocxo-based Clocksupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conventionally, we consider all estimates beginning with the first one provided by the UFIR filter on a horizon of N opt = 3500 points. The results confirm a conclusion that was earlier made in [10] and [40]: the UFIR filter is more robust than KF against the GPS time uncertainties and more accurate in clock state estimating. In fact, errors in all of the UFIR estimates (Fig.…”
Section: B Gps-based State Estimation Of Ocxo-based Clocksupporting
confidence: 88%
“…3) are more smoothed than those by KF and lie closer to zero. Note that errors in the KF can be reduced by decreasing the σ 2 y (τ ) values [40] at τ = 1, 10, 100 s. It, however, turns the Allan variance beyond the OCXO specification. The KF thus does not suit the clock model well and the UFIR definitely is a better choice.…”
Section: B Gps-based State Estimation Of Ocxo-based Clockmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In [14], the authors have presented an algorithm based on the KF to address an issue with missing data. Let us notice that the KF optimality has important requirements such as a complete knowledge of the noise statistics, the noise distribution must be strictly Gaussian, an adequate model must be used, and a knowledge of the initial conditions is mandatory [15][16][17][18]. If these requirements are not met, the performance of the KF may drastically degrade and become unacceptable for real world WSN applications [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, it is a finite impulse response (FIR). Obviously this finite impulse response cannot be strictly described by the commonly used first-order autoregressive model because the latter is an infinite impulse response [26][27][28]. On the other hand, at the statistical level, the real-time determination of DID is actually a recursive least squares estimate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%