1968
DOI: 10.1016/0012-1606(68)90033-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clonal analysis of nuclear differentiation in Tetrahymena

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1972
1972
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We conclude that the two macronuclei of an exconjugant are statistically independent of one another in their response to starvation. 6) mt I1 shows a curious behavior, already noticed by Bleyman and Simon [15] and in less extreme form by Nanney and Allen [ 111 : when mt I1 appeared at all in one of our caryonides (eight independent occurrences), the macronucleus was pure for this mt ( Table 3, group D). Indeed, mt I1 caryonides account for six of the 13 pure caryonides observed under late refeeding.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We conclude that the two macronuclei of an exconjugant are statistically independent of one another in their response to starvation. 6) mt I1 shows a curious behavior, already noticed by Bleyman and Simon [15] and in less extreme form by Nanney and Allen [ 111 : when mt I1 appeared at all in one of our caryonides (eight independent occurrences), the macronucleus was pure for this mt ( Table 3, group D). Indeed, mt I1 caryonides account for six of the 13 pure caryonides observed under late refeeding.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Our present studies focus attention on another mt I1 anomaly already noted before, namely, the unusual tendency of newly developed mt 11-containing macronuclei to be pure or nearly pure for mt 11 [11,15]. A total of 37 mt 11-containing caryonides have now been analyzed.…”
Section: Lntranuclear Coordination and The Bimodal And Independent Mtmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An equal mixture of 35:10 and 22:23 nuclei gives an expected initial estimate of 33:12, moderating gradually to 29:16 after about 100 fissions. In view of the variation within pairs already known from the assortment of H serotypes (Bleyman, Simon & Brosi, 1966), this seems a reasonable explanation. It is also clear that small trends, even if very general in occurrence, cannot be taken as proof of the 66 subunit model.…”
Section: (I) Statistical Analysis Of Assortment Datamentioning
confidence: 95%