2010
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.22393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clonal complex chromosome aberration in non‐ossifying fibroma

Abstract: Cytogenetic information of non-ossifying fibromas (NOFs) is exceptionally limited. This fact relies, in part, on their benign nature but mainly because most cases evolve undetected or there is no need for surgical intervention. We report the case of a NOF arising in the left tibia of a 14-year-old male with an invariable clonal translocation. The karyotype was denoted as 42-46,XY,t(11;3;14)(q23;p21;p11). There are only two previous reported cases of clonally aberrant NOF. Records from additional cases will be … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, data supporting a monoclonal origin [12] and the demonstration of clonal chromosome abnormalities in at least some BFHs support a neoplastic pathogenesis [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, data supporting a monoclonal origin [12] and the demonstration of clonal chromosome abnormalities in at least some BFHs support a neoplastic pathogenesis [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the NOF and the FCD refer to the same histopathological process, the NOF is distinguished from the FCD by its larger size (3 cm) and extension from the cortex into the medullary cavity [2,10] . While the majority of NOFs are asymptomatic, those that are particularly large may cause chronic pain and/or pathologic fracture in the long bones [11,12] . Diagnosis of NOF in the long bones is based upon the characteristic radiographic and clinical appearance, typically the NOF appears as an asymptomatic multiloculated lesion often identified incidentally during radiographic evaluation indicated for another reason [1,11,12] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the NOF and the FCD refer to the same histopathological process, the NOF is distinguished from the FCD by its larger size ([3 cm) and extension from the cortex into the medullary cavity [2,13]. While the majority of NOFs are asymptomatic, those that are particularly large may cause chronic pain and/or pathologic fracture in the long bones [14,15]. Diagnosis of NOF in the long bones is based upon the characteristic radiographic and clinical appearance, typically the NOF appears as an asymptomatic multiloculated lesion often identified incidentally during radiographic evaluation indicated for another reason [1,14,15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the majority of NOFs are asymptomatic, those that are particularly large may cause chronic pain and/or pathologic fracture in the long bones [14,15]. Diagnosis of NOF in the long bones is based upon the characteristic radiographic and clinical appearance, typically the NOF appears as an asymptomatic multiloculated lesion often identified incidentally during radiographic evaluation indicated for another reason [1,14,15]. When arising in a large, tubular bone, the NOF is always eccentric and ovoid and often results in thinning and expansion of the overlying cortex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation