2000
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0177(2000)9999:9999<::aid-dvdy1042>3.3.co;2-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clonal organization in the postnatal mouse central nervous system is prefigured in the embryonic neuroepithelium

Abstract: Easy as π: An unusual indenylidene to η5‐indenyl rearrangement of a ruthenium catalyst has been observed. The resulting complex is the formal decomposition product of an olefin metathesis precatalyst that displays exceptional activity in the racemization of chiral alcohols at very low catalyst loadings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation suggested it reasonable to conclude that those cells clustered in specific layers were derived from the same cell lineage. The restricted distribution of PC cells along the anterior-posterior axis of PC appeared consistent for both neurons and glia, in agreement with the idea of a spatial conservation between related cells (Mathis and Nicolas 2000). The discrepancies reported by other authors, showing clonally related cells migrating long distances (Kirkwood et al 1992) could be due to differences in the method for clonal analysis.…”
Section: Analysis Of Cell Lineagessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This observation suggested it reasonable to conclude that those cells clustered in specific layers were derived from the same cell lineage. The restricted distribution of PC cells along the anterior-posterior axis of PC appeared consistent for both neurons and glia, in agreement with the idea of a spatial conservation between related cells (Mathis and Nicolas 2000). The discrepancies reported by other authors, showing clonally related cells migrating long distances (Kirkwood et al 1992) could be due to differences in the method for clonal analysis.…”
Section: Analysis Of Cell Lineagessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Evidence for bipotent mesoderm and neurectoderm-generating progenitors had been acquired in the past from single cell labeling experiments in the mouse (Forlani et al, 2003; Lawson et al, 1991). The contribution of posterior stem cell-like cells to the notochord (Selleck and Stern, 1991; Stern et al, 1992), the somites (Selleck and Stern, 1991; Stern et al, 1992), and the neural tube (Mathis and Nicolas, 2000a; Mathis and Nicolas, 2000b; Mathis and Nicolas, 2003) had also been reported.…”
Section: A Function For Hox and Caudal-related Genes In Axial Growthmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Single progenitors or clusters of progenitors can be labeled by genetically engineered retroviruses or germlinetransmitted genetic insertions. This has provided information on the number of progenitors giving rise to a given brain region and the types of neurons derived from single progenitors (Cepko, 1988;Sanes, 1989Sanes, , 1994Miyake et al, 1993;Baader et al, 1996;Goldman et al, 1997;Mathis et al, 1997;Mathis and Nicolas, 2000, 2003. As general fate-mapping tools, however, these particular techniques suffer from limitations in targeting (random progenitors are labeled) as well as in scope (few or scattered progenitors are labeled).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%