Clonal variability among Rosa indica rootstocks: morphology, horticultural traits and productivity of scions

Raviv, M.; Medina, Shlomit; Shamir, Y.; Gilad, S.; Duvdevani, Orna; Shor, Y.; Schayer, R.

doi:10.1016/0304-4238(93)90144-f

Cited by 7 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…High tissue concentrations of calcium and chloride, and boron and chloride were reported on scions growing on R. indica 'Major' (Johansson, 1979) and R. multiflora (Byrne and Furuta, 1967), respectively. Such differences in rootstock nutrient uptake and accumulation patterns, particularly in newer recirculating hydroponic production systems or under conditions of poor water quality, could significantly affect rose flower yield and thus deserve research attention (Cabrera, 2001;Raviv et al, 1993). In this study, the effect of the rootstock on inorganic nutrient content of roses was not investigated.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Earlier and recent comparative studies on rose rootstock performance have shown variable results, undoubtedly due to a myriad of factors, including a multitude of scion-rootstock combinations, rootstock clonal effects, type and depth of growing medium (soil and soilless), length of experimental period, geographic region, environmental parameters, and cultural practices (de Vries and Dubois, 1990;Fuchs, 1994;Gammon and McFadden, 1979;Hanan and Grueber, 1987;Holley, 1969;Johansson, 1979;Obiol and Cardus, 1974;Raviv et al, 1993). Most of these studies on rootstock performance have paid more attention to flower yield (number per plant) than other plant response parameters (Cabrera, 2002).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Raviv et al (1993) suggested that for each rose cultivar, rootstock clones should be selected to ensure highest productivity. Safi (2005) reported that regardless of as rootstock type, the three cultivar-rootstock combinations were superior to the own-rooted plants for yield and re-blooming time required.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Effect of Rootstock on Rooting and Early Yield of Stenting-propagated Cut Roses

Park¹,

Jeong²

2015

HST

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The study was conducted to investigate the effect of rootstock on growth and early yield of stenting-propagated cut roses (Rosa hybrida Hort.) 'Pink Aurora' and 'Yellow King'. The scions, prepared as single-node cuttings, each with a five-leaflet leaf, were grafted onto cuttings of Rosa indica 'Major', Rosa multiflora 'Chille Wonye No. 1', Rosa multiflora 'K-1', or Rosa multiflora 'Burr' as the rootstock. The rootstock cuttings were removed of all leaves and buds before grafting. The base of scion and the top of rootstock were held together and simultaneously cut at a 45° angle for ease of grafting. Scion-rootstock unions were stuck in rockwool cubes and placed on a misted glasshouse bench for rooting before being transplanted into a rockwool slabs for cultivation. Rooting was the greatest in the 'Pink Aurora' and 'Yellow King' grafted on the rootstock Rosa indica 'Major'. In 'Pink Aurora', stem length, stem diameter, five-leaflet leaves per stem, and stem fresh weight of the harvested cut flowers were not affected by the rootstock. The greatest total yield of 'Pink Aurora' was obtained in plants grafted onto the Rosa indica 'Major' rootstock. Overall growth of 'Yellow King' was the greatest in plants grafted onto Rosa multiflora 'Burr' rootstock, although total yield was not affected by the rootstock. These results suggest that Rosa indica 'Major' is the most effective rootstock not only for rooting, but also for early yield and growth for stenting propagation of these cut roses.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Effect of Rootstock on Rooting and Early Yield of Stenting-propagated Cut Roses

Park¹,

Jeong²

2015

HST

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Other abiotic stresses like poor air-filled porosity (i.e., poor soil aeration) have been shown to significantly affect the root and shoot growth of 'Natal Briar'grafted plants (Evans et al, 2009), which contrasts the historically proven yielding performance of 'Manetti'-grafted plants in heavy (clay)-textured and shallow field soils (Hanan and Grueber, 1987). The rootstock R. odorata (also known as R. indica 'Major'), once very popular in North America (Hanan and Grueber, 1987), still much-esteemed and highly used in the cut rose industry in the Mediterranean area (de Vries, 2003;Raviv et al, 1993), lagged significantly in biomass response to salinity stress compared with 'Manetti' and 'Natal Briar' (Table 2). This observation is supported by data from Wahome et al (2000), who observed the worst growth and eventual death of this rootstock compared with the rootstock R. rubiginosa and the scion 'Kardinal' when irrigated Fig.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Greenhouse Rose Yield and Ion Accumulation Responses to Salt Stress as Modulated by Rootstock Selection

Cabrera¹,

Solis-Perez²,

Sloan³

2009

horts

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Greenhouse rose (Rosa × spp. L.) production is facing the use of poor-quality irrigation waters and regulatory pressures to recycle runoff and drainage effluents. Two experiments (were conducted to evaluate the yield and quality and ion accumulation responses of roses grafted on various rootstocks to increasing salinity stress. In Expt. 1, the scion ‘Bridal White’ grafted on ‘Manetti’, R. odorata (Andr.), ‘Natal Briar’, and ‘Dr. Huey’ were irrigated over four flowering cycles with complete nutrient solutions supplemented with NaCl at 0, 5, and 30 mm. In Expt. 2, plants of ‘Red France’ on ‘Manetti’ and ‘Natal Briar’ were irrigated over six flowering cycles with complete nutrient solutions supplemented with NaCl + CaCl2 (2:1 m ratio) at 0, 1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 24 mm. Salt concentration increases significantly and negatively affected the biomass, cut flower production, and foliage quality of the roses in both experiments, but the responses were modulated by rootstock selection. ‘Manetti’ plants in general sustained better absolute and relative biomass and flower yields, accumulated less Na+ and Cl− in its tissues, and showed less toxicity symptoms with increasing salinity than the others. ‘Natal Briar’ also had similar absolute productivity responses as ‘Manetti’ but were afflicted by a significantly different mineral nutrient profile, including higher accumulations and toxicities with Na+ and Cl− that led to lower foliage visual ratings. Conversely, the relative yields of plants on ‘Dr. Huey’ and R. odorata were similarly reduced by increasing salinity, but the former had lower Na+ and Cl− concentrations in its tissues and better visual scores than the latter, which fared as the worst. A combined analysis of the results suggests that on a productivity basis (biomass and flower yields), greenhouse roses could withstand overall maximum electrical conductivities (i.e., osmotic effects) of applied fertigation solutions of 3.0 ± 0.5 dS·m−1. On the other hand, and considering the aesthetic responses (visual scores) of on-plant and harvested foliage (cut flower shoots), greenhouse rose tolerance to applied Na+ and Cl− concentrations (ion-specific effects) could range up to 10 ± 2 mm.