1995
DOI: 10.1016/0378-1127(95)03513-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clone and leaf position effects on Populus defoliation by leaf-cutting bees (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relationship between the length and width of the leaf cuttings Figure 3. The relationships between the length of the leaves with the length and width of the leaf cuttings Leafcutter bee-plant interaction pressure on a plant as reported by Nugent and Wagner (1995), except for very young saplings. The toughness of the hard midrib and veins of older leaves might prevent the bees from using them (Horne 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The relationship between the length and width of the leaf cuttings Figure 3. The relationships between the length of the leaves with the length and width of the leaf cuttings Leafcutter bee-plant interaction pressure on a plant as reported by Nugent and Wagner (1995), except for very young saplings. The toughness of the hard midrib and veins of older leaves might prevent the bees from using them (Horne 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…We inspected a total of 6,120 individuals of 214 broadleafed species during July 2016 and 2017, immediately after the breeding season of the bees, thoroughly examining leaves at all possible heights (using binoculars if necessary) for leafcutter bee damage. As leafcutter bees are known to have preferences according to plant subspecies, clones and hybrids (Eigenbrode, White, & Tipton, ; Nugent & Wagner, ), we included all infraspecific categories in the data separately, except for ornamental roses (11 hybrids are present in the UA Arboretum, but these were included in the analysis as a single species, Rosa sp.). Although it has been reported that Megachile spp.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the leaf preferences of megachilid bee species have rarely been investigated. Identifying leaf preference could inform management and conservation [ 19 ], research and the improvement of experimental design [ 20 22 ], as well as plant selection and horticulture to reduce damage to ornamental plant species [ 23 ]. For example, Horne [ 19 ] experimentally evaluated the leaf preference of M. rotundata among 11 plant species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for leaf pieces in nature and subsequently used the plant in pots in enclosures to study relationships between female body size and fecundity. Finally, Nugent & Wagner [ 23 ] compared the level of leaf defoliation by unidentified Megachile bee species on seven different Populus cultivars and found one cultivar was defoliated significantly less than all others. Mechanical properties of leaves are evidently important for leaf preference in leaf-collecting Megachile bees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%