1993
DOI: 10.1128/jb.175.10.2961-2969.1993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cloning and sequencing of the gene encoding glutamine synthetase I from the archaeum Pyrococcus woesei: anomalous phylogenies inferred from analysis of archaeal and bacterial glutamine synthetase I sequences

Abstract: The gene ginA encoding glutamine synthetase I (GSI) from the archaeum Pyrococcus woesei was cloned and sequenced with the Sudfolobus solfataricus ginA gene as the probe. An operon reading frame of 448 amino acids was identified within a DNA segment of 1,528 bp. The encoded protein was 49%o identical with the GSI of Methanococcus voltae and exhibited conserved regions characteristic of the GSI family. The P. woesei GSI was aligned with available homologs from other archaea (S. soifataricus, M. voitae) and with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
40
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
6
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For Gln I sequences, the species T. maritima again lacked the insert present in various Gram-negative bacteria, supporting its classification as a Gram-positive bacteria (Brown et al, 1994). In phylogenetic trees based on Gln I sequences, archaebacteria and Gram-positive bacteria show a paraphyletic branching (Tiboni et al, 1993;Brown et al, 1994;Golding and Gupta, 1995) similar to that seen for Hsp70 sequences. The distinctness of Grampositive bacteria from Gram-negative bacteria is also supported by signature sequences in a number of additional proteins, including GroEL (Hsp60) (Gupta, 1995a;Gupta et al, 1997), and acetolactate synthase (unpublished data).…”
Section: Signature Sequences Showing Distinctness Of Archaebacteriamentioning
confidence: 78%
“…For Gln I sequences, the species T. maritima again lacked the insert present in various Gram-negative bacteria, supporting its classification as a Gram-positive bacteria (Brown et al, 1994). In phylogenetic trees based on Gln I sequences, archaebacteria and Gram-positive bacteria show a paraphyletic branching (Tiboni et al, 1993;Brown et al, 1994;Golding and Gupta, 1995) similar to that seen for Hsp70 sequences. The distinctness of Grampositive bacteria from Gram-negative bacteria is also supported by signature sequences in a number of additional proteins, including GroEL (Hsp60) (Gupta, 1995a;Gupta et al, 1997), and acetolactate synthase (unpublished data).…”
Section: Signature Sequences Showing Distinctness Of Archaebacteriamentioning
confidence: 78%
“…This is a feature in common with many other archaeal genes Tiboni et al, 1993;Uemori e t al., 1993;Zwickl e t al., 1990).…”
Section: Cttatgatccatgcatatcttgct~tc~gtggtt~tttmtcctttttatctamentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Hsp70, glutamate dehydrogenase, giutamine synthetase), the close relationship between these two groups of organisms was retained and still observed (Benachenhou-Lahfa et al. 1993;Gupta and Golding, 1993;Tiboni et al, 1993;Golding and Gupta, 1995), In the period that followed (during which the environment changed from predominantly anaerobic to aerobic) other groups of archaebactena and eubactei ia (including the Gram-tiegative group) are postulated to have evolved from these ancestral groups. The evolulion of archaebacteria!…”
Section: Archaebacteria (Tcp 1)mentioning
confidence: 99%