Regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins increase the intrinsic guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase) activity of G-protein ␣ subunits in vitro, but how specific G-protein-coupled receptor systems are targeted for down-regulation by RGS proteins remains uncharacterized. Here, we describe the GTPase specificity of RGS12 and identify four alternatively spliced forms of human RGS12 mRNA. Two RGS12 isoforms of 6.3 and 5.7 kilobases (kb), encoding both an N-terminal PDZ (PSD-95/ Dlg/ZO-1) domain and the RGS domain, are expressed in most tissues, with highest levels observed in testis, ovary, spleen, cerebellum, and caudate nucleus. The 5.7-kb isoform has an alternative 3 end encoding a putative C-terminal PDZ domain docking site. Two smaller isoforms, of 3.1 and 3.7 kb, which lack the PDZ domain and encode the RGS domain with and without the alternative 3 end, respectively, are most abundantly expressed in brain, kidney, thymus, and prostate. In vitro biochemical assays indicate that RGS12 is a GTPaseactivating protein for G i class ␣ subunits. Biochemical and interaction trap experiments suggest that the RGS12 N terminus acts as a classical PDZ domain, binding selectively to C-terminal (A/S)-T-X-(L/V) motifs as found within both the interleukin-8 receptor B (CXCR2) and the alternative 3 exon form of RGS12. The presence of an alternatively spliced PDZ domain within RGS12 suggests a mechanism by which RGS proteins may target specific G-protein-coupled receptor systems for desensitization.The mammalian "regulators of G-protein signaling" (RGS) 1 gene family was first identified by sequence and functional similarity to fungal and nematode genes captured in genetic screens for negative regulators of specific G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signals (1-3). In vitro biochemical analyses soon established that this gene family encodes potent accelerators ("GAPs") of the intrinsic GTP hydrolysis activity of Gprotein ␣ subunits, revealing a molecular mechanism by which RGS proteins drive G-proteins into their inactive GDP-bound form and hence down-regulate GPCR signal transduction in vivo (reviewed in Refs. 4 and 5). However, the mechanisms by which individual RGS proteins desensitize pathways activated by particular GPCRs remain to be elucidated. Tightly regulated transcription has been described for RGS1 (3), RGS2 (6), and RGS3-RGS11 (7), and palmitoylation of the cysteine-rich N terminus of G␣-interacting protein (GAIP) has also been observed (8); however, transcriptional regulation and post-translational modifications of particular RGS family members can each only be expected to afford a gross level of intracellular control over the temporal and spatial expression of G␣-directed GAP activity.We and others have hypothesized that regions outside the RGS fold contribute to regulation of G␣ GAP activity and/or targeting of individual RGS proteins to particular receptor signaling pathways (4, 5, 9, 10). Here, we report the GAP activity of RGS12 and identify a PDZ-like N-terminal sequence within two splice forms. PDZ domains...