Close Air Support and Interdiction Missions as Seen by the Air Force and Army

Walker, Scott G.

doi:10.21236/ada387722

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Also, another research proposes specific list of professions for the 16 MBTI personality types, in which they will be more satisfied and would be able to perform at their best e.g. ESTJ, ISFJ, ISFP, INTJ, ENFJ, INFJ, ENFP, INFP can adopt teaching as a profession, which suits their personality (Walker, 1997), but this study found that at primary and secondary level, majority of high performing teachers belong to ISFJ, INFP and ENFP personality types. This inconsistency in results of this study may be due to various factors e.g., demographics, cultural, regional etc.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Journal of Contemporary Teacher Education (Jcte)

Editor JCTE

2023

JCTE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Journal of Contemporary Teacher Education (Jcte)

Editor JCTE

2023

JCTE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Effective Air Interdiction in Peace Enforcement

Evans¹

2001

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

EFFECTIVE AIR INTERDICTION IN PEACE ENFORCEMENT by MAJOR Robert D. Evans, USAF, 55 pages. The United States Air Force has become increasingly involved in peace enforcement missions throughout the world since the end of the Cold War. Recent examples include Operations Allied Force and Deliberate Force in the Balkans, and Operations Northern Watch and Southern Watch in Iraq. While monitoring no-fly zones is the most obvious mission assigned to air forces conducting peace enforcement operations, it is not the only way in which airpower contributes. Other missions include enforcement of sanctions and exclusion zones, protection of shipping, strikes and raids, and shows of force. In order to perform these missions, the basic U.S. Air Force combat functions must be adapted to fit the unique environment of the peace enforcement operation. Although peace enforcement missions may differ considerably from traditional combat, United States Air Force doctrine provides only broad guidance on how basic functions apply to peace enforcement. U.S. Air Force Doctrine Document 2-3, Military Operations Other Than War, states that Air Force units support peace enforcement with traditional air-to-air and air-toground operations, but does not describe how these operations are conducted or integrated with the joint force. Instead, the U.S. Air Force believes that normal operational doctrine provides sufficient guidance to accomplish these missions. This monograph challenges the claim that normal U.S. Air Force operational doctrine provides an acceptable basis for peace enforcement. Specifically, the monograph determines whether current U.S. Air Force doctrine promotes effective air interdiction in a peace enforcement operation, using a division-sized land component as a model. The author has determined three criteria for effective air interdiction in peace enforcement operations: unity of effort, responsiveness, and flexibility. These criteria provide a lens through which to examine the suitability of current doctrine to the challenge of providing effective air interdiction to a division-sized force conducting peace enforcement. The author chose a divisionsized force because of the unique command and control relationships, near-term planning focus, and potential for such a force to conduct a peace enforcement mission as the land component of a Joint Task Force. The author has organized the monograph into four chapters. The first chapter defines the environment of peace enforcement. Following chapters examine flexibility in air interdiction doctrine, unity of effort and responsiveness. The final chapter analyzes the suitability of current U.S. Air Force doctrine to provide effective air interdiction to U.S. Army divisions conducting peace enforcement missions. The monograph concludes that current doctrine allows for the tailored capabilities needed by the division and promotes effective air interdiction that is flexible, responsive and applied with unity of effort.

show abstract

Close Air Support and Interdiction Missions as Seen by the Air Force and Army

Cited by 2 publications

References 2 publications

Journal of Contemporary Teacher Education (Jcte)

Journal of Contemporary Teacher Education (Jcte)

Effective Air Interdiction in Peace Enforcement

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About