Close Encounters: Analyzing How Social Similarity and Propinquity Contribute to Strong Network Connections

Abstract

Models of network formation emphasize the importance of social similarity and propinquity in producing strong interpersonal connections. The positive effect each factor can have on tie strength has been documented across a number of studies. And yet we know surprisingly very little about how the two factors combine to produce strong ties. Being in close proximity could either amplify or dampen the positive effect that social similarity can have on tie strength. Data on tie strength among teachers working in five public schools was analyzed to shed light on this theoretical question. The empirical results indicated that teachers who were similar in age were more likely to be connected by a strong tie, especially teachers for whom age similarity was more likely to be salient. Moreover, teachers who took breaks at the same time or who had classrooms on the same floor communicated more frequently and felt more emotionally attached. Among the public school teachers, propinquity amplified the positive effect that age similarity had on tie strength. The strongest network connections occurred among age-similar teachers who had classrooms on the same floor. The empirical results illustrate the value of considering how social similarity and propinquity contribute to strong ties independently and when combined with each other.

Success Factors in Product Seeding: The Role of Homophily

“…These people have more in common in terms of beliefs, values, interests, needs, wants, stages in life, and lifestyles (Kleinbaum, Stuart, and Tushman 2013;McPherson, Smith-Lovin, and Cook 2001;Reagans 2011). Homophily 4 may be formed due to the underlying psychological tendencies that people like to interact with others who are like themselves (Kleinbaum, Stuart, and Tushman 2013;McPherson, Smith-Lovin, and Cook 2001).…”

Which Problems to Solve? Online Knowledge Sharing and Attention Allocation in Organizations

“…Applying findings from research on interpersonal knowledge sharing to the online context suggests that individuals might be more likely to respond to problems from other individuals with whom they have connections based on factors such as social similarity, physical proximity, or prior familiarity (e.g. Espinosa, Slaughter, Kraut, & Herbsleb, 2007;Quigley, Tesluk, Locke, & Bartol, 2007;Reagans, 2011). Yet in online settings, individuals often respond to problems from others with whom they have no such connections, to the extent that Constant and colleagues (1996) noted that online knowledge sharing seems to be driven by "the kindness of strangers."…”

Collaboration in open-plan offices

“…Borgatti & Cross, 2003;Reagans, 2011) and was not easily explained by gathering further empirical material. This led me to focus my research on understanding why scientists in the building were not collaborating across organisational boundaries.…”

“…Although Knoben and Oerlemans (2006) argue that people who perceive themselves as similar are more likely to seek each other out and work together, the research on perceived proximity tends to conflate the concepts of social similarity with physical proximity. Yet Reagans (2011) demonstrates that social similarity and physical proximity have independent impacts on the strength of employee relationships.…”