Tuberculosis remains disproportionately concentrated among the poor, yet known determinants of tuberculosis reactivation may fail to explain observed disparities in disease rates according to wealth. Reviewing data on tuberculosis disparities in India and the wealth distribution of known tuberculosis risk factors, we describe how social mixing patterns could be contributing to tuberculosis disparities. Wealth-assortative mixing, wherein individuals are more likely to contact others from similar socioeconomic backgrounds, amplifies smaller differences in risk of tuberculosis, resulting in large population-level disparities. As disparities and assortativeness increase, tuberculosis becomes more difficult to control, an effect that is obscured by looking at population averages of epidemiological parameters, such as case detection rates. We illustrate how tuberculosis control efforts may benefit from preferential targeting toward the poor. In India, an equivalent-scale intervention could have a substantially greater impact if targeted to those living below the poverty line, compared with a population-wide strategy. In addition to potential efficiencies in targeting higher-risk populations, tuberculosis control efforts would reduce more secondary tuberculosis cases, per primary case diagnosed, if they were preferentially targeted to the poor. We highlight the need to collect programmatic data on tuberculosis disparities and explicitly incorporate equity considerations in tuberculosis control plans.