2019
DOI: 10.1007/s40273-019-00786-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Close-Person Spill-Overs in End-of-Life Care: Using Hierarchical Mapping to Identify Whose Outcomes to Include in Economic Evaluations

Abstract: Please refer to published version for the most recent bibliographic citation information. If a published version is known of, the repository item page linked to above, will contain details on accessing it.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Brown et al and Lavelle et al measure health spillover effects in caregivers or parents of children with autism; Brown et al using indirect methods (EQ-5D and SF-6D) and Lavelle et al using a direct assessment (time trade-off questions) [12,13]. An overview paper by Wittenberg et al provides a comprehensive catalog of caregiver/ family member utilities in the literature organized into three groupings: health utilities that isolate the change in quality of life associated with spillover, health utilities of a caregiver/family member sample and a comparison or control group, and health utilities of caregivers/family members alone (no comparison group) [14]. Finally, Canaway et al present qualitative findings collected at end of life on who is considered "close" when assessing spillover in economic evaluations [15].…”
Section: Topics In This Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Brown et al and Lavelle et al measure health spillover effects in caregivers or parents of children with autism; Brown et al using indirect methods (EQ-5D and SF-6D) and Lavelle et al using a direct assessment (time trade-off questions) [12,13]. An overview paper by Wittenberg et al provides a comprehensive catalog of caregiver/ family member utilities in the literature organized into three groupings: health utilities that isolate the change in quality of life associated with spillover, health utilities of a caregiver/family member sample and a comparison or control group, and health utilities of caregivers/family members alone (no comparison group) [14]. Finally, Canaway et al present qualitative findings collected at end of life on who is considered "close" when assessing spillover in economic evaluations [15].…”
Section: Topics In This Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Papers using qualitative approaches suggest a direct valuation approach for spillover may be exceedingly difficult for respondents-to disentangle their own health and simultaneously balance the positive and negative aspects of having an ill family member, especially for caregivers [20]. A superior approach is likely to be the use of a comparison group as described in one set of papers reviewed in Wittenberg et al [14]. For this type of study design, though, additional resources will be needed to include a comparison sample.…”
Section: Emerging Themesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Whose QALYs to include in spillover is also an unanswered question as evidence suggests effects extend beyond the primary caregiver [39] and perceptions of relevance (i.e. 'closeness') vary across individuals [40]. The articles in this review provide the data to inform family-based CEAs but do not inform the questions underlying appropriate incorporation approaches.…”
Section: How and Under What Circumstances Should Spillover Be Includementioning
confidence: 99%