Close to home: Privatization and personalization of militarized death in Israeli home videos

Abstract

Since the mid-1990s, Israeli television has broadcast soldiers’ memorial videos made by families commemorating their lost loved one. The videos are broadcast only one day a year during the National Memorial Day as part of an orchestrated, nationwide commemoration and mourning. In Israeli society these video productions are deemed private and personal, therefore existing outside political, economic, institutional and aesthetic discourses. This article argues that the positioning of family-made video productions outside the social sphere obscures the politics and economies of Israeli cultural memory. To evaluate the social impetus of family-made memorial videos, the article traces the history of their emergence in the public view and highlights two parallel processes of privatization: the privatization of commemoration and memorialization in Israel, and the privatization of the Israeli public broadcast system. It also explores the appropriation of such home movies by state institutions (the archives in particular) and official historiography, and proposes three concepts for the discussion: intimacy, fetish and cliché. It concludes by interpreting the videos’ intimate storytelling within the public, digital and broadcast sphere as a cultural and ritualistic speech-convention that projects political viewpoints and understandings.

Looking backward to the future: Counter-memory as oppositional knowledge-production in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict

“…The land has many national memorials and monuments dedicated to the Holocaust, war victims and heroes, and terror victims (Handelman, 2004), and Israelis are encouraged to hike, appreciate the new forests and ancient olive trees, and reinterpret the national myths (Katriel, 1996; Zerubavel, 1995). A great deal of non-official, individual, and local commemorations of Jewish victims and heroes take place as well, especially through memorial books and films (Melamed, 2013; Slyomovics, 1998: xiii).…”