2012
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a3034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closed-Cell Stent for Coil Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms: Clinical and Angiographic Results

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Recanalization is observed in 20 -40% of endovascularly treated intracranial aneurysms. To further reduce the recanalization and expand endovascular treatment, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of closed-cell SACE. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Between 2007 and 2010, 147 consecutive patients (110 women; mean age, 54 years) presenting at 2 centers with 161 wide-neck ruptured and unruptured aneurysms were treated by using SACE. Inclusion criteria were wide-neck aneurysms (Ͼ4 mm or a dome/neck r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we restricted the analysis to unruptured or nonacutely ruptured aneurysms, the rates of morbidity and mortality varied between 3.8%-8.3% and 0%-3.9%, respectively. [28][29][30][31][32][33][34] The data presented in our study show a safety profile comparable with that of stentassisted coil embolization.…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
“…If we restricted the analysis to unruptured or nonacutely ruptured aneurysms, the rates of morbidity and mortality varied between 3.8%-8.3% and 0%-3.9%, respectively. [28][29][30][31][32][33][34] The data presented in our study show a safety profile comparable with that of stentassisted coil embolization.…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
“…Likewise, other groups have reported that SAC of ruptured aneurysms is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. 2,15,16 Thus, the safety-efficacy profile of SAC is clearly less favorable in ruptured than in unruptured aneurysms. In some patients with acutely ruptured aneurysms, however, SAC is the only available treatment option.…”
Section: Strokementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several recent reports have demonstrated that SACE promotes occlusion of incompletely coiled aneurysms and lowers recanalization rates compared with nonstenting embolization, probably because of the hemodynamic effects of stents. [1][2][3][4][5] However, recanalization rates of SACE are 8.1%-17.2% 2,4,5 ; therefore, these rates still need to be improved. In addition, various configurations of stentings have been proposed and performed for bifurcation aneurysms, including a single stent from a proximal to a distal vessel; a waffle-cone stent 6 ; a horizontal stent [7][8][9] ; a nonoverlapping-Y stent 10 ; a kissing (double-barrel) Y stent, in which both stents are deployed in a parallel fashion 11,12 ; and a crossing-Y stent, in which the second stent is deployed through the interstices of the first stent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%