2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfa.2015.09.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closed convex hulls of unitary orbits in C⁎-algebras of real rank zero

Abstract: In this paper, we study closed convex hulls of unitary orbits in various C * -algebras. For unital C * -algebras with real rank zero and a faithful tracial state determining equivalence of projections, a notion of majorization describes the closed convex hulls of unitary orbits for self-adjoint operators. Other notions of majorization are examined in these C * -algebras. Combining these ideas with the Dixmier property, we demonstrate unital, infinite dimensional C * -algebras of real rank zero and strict compa… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We show the equivlance between (b) and (c) in Theorem 1.2 (similarly results for positive operators can be found in [33,63,80]).…”
Section: Hardy-littlewood-pólya Majorization In the Infinite Ssettingsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We show the equivlance between (b) and (c) in Theorem 1.2 (similarly results for positive operators can be found in [33,63,80]).…”
Section: Hardy-littlewood-pólya Majorization In the Infinite Ssettingsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Using a result by Day [20], we provide below a similar (but simpler) proof for completeness. We note that the special case for finite factors was described in [36] (see also [80,Theorem 2.18]). The following extends [49] (see also [80,Theorem 2.18] and [33, Theorem 4.7.…”
Section: Alberti-uhlmann Problem In the Setting Of Finite Von Neumann Algebrasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, as ǫ was arbitrary, the result follows Proof. If a ∈ conv(U(b)) then a ≺ τ b for all τ ∈ T (A) by [39,Lemma 2.20] (the assumption that τ must be faithful is not required by the same argument as in Theorem 2.3). Suppose that a ≺ τ b for all τ ∈ T (A).…”
Section: The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%