2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11129-006-8129-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closed-form Bayesian inferences for the logit model via polynomial expansions

Abstract: Articles in Marketing and choice literatures have demonstrated the need for incorporating person-level heterogeneity into behavioral models (e.g., logit models for multiple binary outcomes as studied here). However, the logit likelihood extended with a population distribution of heterogeneity doesn’t yield closed-form inferences, and therefore numerical integration techniques are relied upon (e.g., MCMC methods). We present here an alternative, closed-form Bayesian inferences for the logit model, which we obta… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is accomplished by deriving our model using a polynomial expansion (which can be expressed in closed form). See Bradlow, Hardie, and Fader (2000), Everson and Bradlow (2002), and Miller, Bradlow, and Dayaratna (2006) for similar polynomial expansion solutions for the negative binomial, beta-binomial, and binary logit models, respectively. Fifth, and related to the previous point, once the model is expressed as a closed-form sum of polynomial terms, we can easily introduce a conjugate mixing distribution (the gamma distribution) to capture the underlying dispersion in incidence rates across individuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is accomplished by deriving our model using a polynomial expansion (which can be expressed in closed form). See Bradlow, Hardie, and Fader (2000), Everson and Bradlow (2002), and Miller, Bradlow, and Dayaratna (2006) for similar polynomial expansion solutions for the negative binomial, beta-binomial, and binary logit models, respectively. Fifth, and related to the previous point, once the model is expressed as a closed-form sum of polynomial terms, we can easily introduce a conjugate mixing distribution (the gamma distribution) to capture the underlying dispersion in incidence rates across individuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Bradlow et al [2], these approximation methods are applied to count data in the form of a negative-binomial distribution. This was subsequently extended by Everson and Bradlow [5] to the Beta-Binomial model and then more generally to choice models [15]. This research is all related to recent research on Variational Bayesian Methods (http://www.variational-bayes.org/; [10]) that provide more general approximation methods.…”
Section: Bayesian Analysis and Big Data Not Bayesian Analysis Or Bigmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In subsequent research, McShane et al (2008) used similar techniques to improve on Weibull count model estimation [35]. Finally, used polynomial expansions to examine the same problem examined here, namely for binary logistic regression [36]. Miller et al's approach, however, suffered from a serious limitation by requiring that the prior distribution be single-sided.…”
Section: Individual-level Heterogeneity and Computational Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%