2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.enganabound.2006.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closed form coefficients in the symmetric boundary element approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to make the analysis possible using the SBEM, the traction has to be computed on the boundary. The rise of the strong singularity in the second integral of Equation (28) has been treated previously in [22,24,25]. The related computational aspects regarding the fourth integral of the previous equation will be discussed in the following section.…”
Section: Present Approachmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to make the analysis possible using the SBEM, the traction has to be computed on the boundary. The rise of the strong singularity in the second integral of Equation (28) has been treated previously in [22,24,25]. The related computational aspects regarding the fourth integral of the previous equation will be discussed in the following section.…”
Section: Present Approachmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These terms were obtained in closed form and implemented in the Karnak.sGbem calculus code [19] according to a strategy that works in the substructuring approach [20,21]. The strategy for evaluation in closed form was shown by Terravecchia [22].…”
Section: D Sbem Analysis With Domain Inelastic Actions 185mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It could be objected that the assemblage between bem-elements having large dimensions and bemelements having small dimensions involves numerical instability in the analysis. This does not happen because all the coefficients of the equation system are obtained in closed form [29]. This characteristic is a special quality of the SGBEM in comparison with other BEM methodologies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These difficulties have been overcome within the SGBEM approach by using different techniques. We can mention the strategies of Bonnet [27], Frangi and Novati [28], Panzeca et al [26], Terravecchia [29] and Holzer [30].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computation of the hypersingular integrals which appears in the context of the SGBEM has been the subject of a significant number of works which include closed-form evaluations of the integrals involved in the computation of matrix elements or regularization methods [8][9][10][12][13][14][15]. These methods are often limited in their field of application (use of properties of the elasticity tensor or restriction to the plane case), except for the generalization of SGBEM by the Fourier method [13] which transforms the singularity by Fourier transform into a problem of convergence at infinite of the Fourier transform and seems quite general.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%