2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11740-010-0283-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closed-form inverse kinematics of 6R milling robot with singularity avoidance

Abstract: For a 6R milling robot, it is necessary to convert the postprocessing cutter locations (CL) into the robot's revolute joint variables. This paper introduces an algorithm for calculating the forward and inverse kinematics of a 6R robot according to the CL data generated by conventional CAD/CAM systems. A redundant mechanism is analyzed to avoid the singular configurations and joint limits. The Denavit-Hartenberg (D-H) convention is referred to for developing the forward kinematics, and a closed-form solution of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The disadvantage of using robots for machining is their low stiffness and accuracy [21], whereas the cutting force of the ultrasonic cutting process for Nomex honeycomb is small enough [22] to meet the accuracy of robot. At present, the studies of robotic machining path planning focus more on robotic kinematic optimization on machining efficiency [23] and accuracy [24], [25], and the tool path is usually generated by general CAM system [24], [26], [27]. However, V-shaped cutting requires special path planning method as mentioned above, and there are few or no reports on the V-shaped path planning for robots at present.…”
Section: Figure 1 Comparison Of Chip Formation Between Milling [7] Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disadvantage of using robots for machining is their low stiffness and accuracy [21], whereas the cutting force of the ultrasonic cutting process for Nomex honeycomb is small enough [22] to meet the accuracy of robot. At present, the studies of robotic machining path planning focus more on robotic kinematic optimization on machining efficiency [23] and accuracy [24], [25], and the tool path is usually generated by general CAM system [24], [26], [27]. However, V-shaped cutting requires special path planning method as mentioned above, and there are few or no reports on the V-shaped path planning for robots at present.…”
Section: Figure 1 Comparison Of Chip Formation Between Milling [7] Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When other matrices are computed, the transformation matrix from end-effector coordinate to base coordinate is obtained [13,14]. The solution to the forward kinematics is as follows…”
Section: Forward Kinematics and Homogeneous Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue of robot inverse kinematics is to calculate all the corresponding joint angles when the pose and location of robot are given [13]. In other words, the joint variables h i (i = 1, 2, _, 6) can be determined based on kinematics equation if the values of n, o, a, p and the needed geometric parameters are known [14].…”
Section: Inverse Kinematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research on robot machining has focused more on the influence of robotic dynamics on machining accuracy and efficiency [46,47,52,53]. Olabi et al have proposed to optimize the tool-tip feedrate in Cartesian space for a given tool path using a smooth jerk limited pattern with consideration of the joints kinematics constraints [52].…”
Section: Robot Machining Path Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Olabi et al have proposed to optimize the tool-tip feedrate in Cartesian space for a given tool path using a smooth jerk limited pattern with consideration of the joints kinematics constraints [52]. That is, the dynamic characteristics of the robot are considered in determining one of the key machining parameters "feedrate".…”
Section: Robot Machining Path Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%