2000
DOI: 10.2514/2.4532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closed-Form Solution of Line-of-Sight Trajectory for Nonmaneuvering Targets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only simple cases are solved analytically in closed-form for three-point guidance, e.g. as treated in [21,22] for a case of idealized LOS trajectory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only simple cases are solved analytically in closed-form for three-point guidance, e.g. as treated in [21,22] for a case of idealized LOS trajectory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the phenomenal growth of highly manoeuvrable targets, research on improved guidance laws is continuing [1][2][3][4][5][6]. In recent years, many authors have addressed the importance of the command-to-line-of-sight (CLOS) guidance law due to the recent advances in beam-pointing technology [7][8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Macfadzean 10) claimed that there is no closed-form solution for LOS trajectory, even with simplifying assumptions such as those made by Locke. In 2000, Jalali-Naini and Esfahanian 4) claimed a closed-form solution for LOS trajectory for non-maneuvering targets. In 2001, Shoucri 15) showed that some scattered published results in the guidance theory field were similar to the generalized proportional navigation (GPN) guidance law.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%