2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2009.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closed-form solutions for crack detection problem of Timoshenko beams with various boundary conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2. Comparison of the proposed method and exact solution by Khaji et al [10] show the accuracy and convergence of the method presented in this study. Table 2 for different values of the angular velocity of spin.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2. Comparison of the proposed method and exact solution by Khaji et al [10] show the accuracy and convergence of the method presented in this study. Table 2 for different values of the angular velocity of spin.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Lin [9] presented a closed-form solution for prediction of natural frequencies of a cracked simply supported Timoshenko beam. Using transfer matrix technique, Khaji et al [10] introduced a closed-form solution for crack detection problem of Timoshenko beams for the various boundary conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the length of the beam is 175 mm, the non-dimensional crack-depth ratio, a c / h, is 0.5 and the shear factor k is 5/6. The results are obtained from the differential transform method and compared with the values obtained by Khaji et al [56]. That the differences are small and satisfactory can be observed in Table 9.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Because of its increasing use as robot arms, machines or structures, Bruch and Mitchell (1987), Oguamanam (2003), Salarieh and Ghorashi (2006) and Ansari et al (2011) investigated the free vibrations of an Euler-Bernoulli or a Timoshenko cantilever beam with a rigid tip in the perspective of studying the behaviour of a flexible member. More recent contributions dealt with non-homogeneous or cracked beams (Li et al, 2013a;Khaji et al, 2009). The influence of the support conditions was also considered, as for example Timoshenko beams on Pasternak foundations (Calio and Greco, 2012) and beams on elastic end support (Li, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%