2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.10.26.513921
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closed genomes uncover a saltwater species ofCandidatusElectronema and shed new light on the boundary between marine and freshwater cable bacteria

Abstract: Cable bacteria of the Desulfobulbaceae family are centimeter-long filamentous bacteria, which are capable of conducting long-distance electron transfer. Currently, all cable bacteria are classified into two candidate genera: Candidatus Electronema, typically found in freshwater environments, and Candidatus Electrothrix, typically found in saltwater environments. This taxonomic framework is based on both 16S rRNA gene sequences and metagenome-assembled genome (MAG) phylogenies. However, most of the currently av… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we report how lower than recommended DNA input affects Nanopore long-read metagenomics by comparing different levels of metagenomic analysis from read QC to retrieval of MAGs. Many previously published Nanopore-based metagenomics studies lack information about the quantity of DNA used for library preparation [19,[24][25][26]32]. To the best of our knowledge, other published metagenomic studies quantified the amount of input DNA and met or exceeded the recommended amount of 1000 ng DNA for input material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, we report how lower than recommended DNA input affects Nanopore long-read metagenomics by comparing different levels of metagenomic analysis from read QC to retrieval of MAGs. Many previously published Nanopore-based metagenomics studies lack information about the quantity of DNA used for library preparation [19,[24][25][26]32]. To the best of our knowledge, other published metagenomic studies quantified the amount of input DNA and met or exceeded the recommended amount of 1000 ng DNA for input material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples for such regions are highly repetitive and/or conserved elements including multiple copies of the same transposable element in one genome [20], for which short read-based de novo assemblies are more likely to fail. Long-read metagenomics has successfully been used to for cMAG recovery from diverse samples, including activated sludge [21,22], water bodies [23], sediment [24] . CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license perpetuity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16S rRNA amplicon sequences from all three time series experiments are available at NCBI in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) and can be found under accession number PRJNA837365 and PRJNA1058976. Metagenomic data is available at the NCBI database under accession number PRJNA730231 (Bjerg et al, 2023) and from ENA under bio project number PRJEB52550 (Sereika et al, 2022). Metatranscriptomic data is available from the NCBI SRA-database under accession number PRJNA1057540.…”
Section: Data Availabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these efforts, the processed cable bacteria samples still contain other microorganisms and thus metagenomics is currently the only option for studying cable bacteria DNA. Even though MAGs for cable bacteria have been recovered from multiple environmental sources 161,166,167 , no closed or even singlecontig cable bacteria genomes have been published prior to Paper 2, likely due to reliance on short reads for assembling the metagenomes 168 .…”
Section: Closing the Genomes Of Cable Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of Paper 2 was to apply long-read Nanopore sequencing for the recovery of cable bacteria MAGs, with an emphasis on recovering single-contig, circular MAGs 168 . Three different samples were sequenced, which were expected to contain members of both cable bacteria candidate genera: the freshwater-based Ca.…”
Section: Closing the Genomes Of Cable Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 99%