2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.06.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closed-loop adaptation of neurofeedback based on mental effort facilitates reinforcement learning of brain self-regulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A detailed description of the neurofeedback environment applied in this study has already been provided in previous work of our group with healthy subjects and stroke patients and is cited here accordingly: The effector of the device applied in this study is a commercially available electromechanical hand orthosis (Amadeo, Tyromotion GmbH, Graz, Austria) which enables mass finger extension and flexion, while the wrist remains fixed without any movement (Bauer et al, 2016a, Bauer et al, 2016b). This robotic orthosis is regularly used in standard rehabilitation exercises independent of brain-interfacing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed description of the neurofeedback environment applied in this study has already been provided in previous work of our group with healthy subjects and stroke patients and is cited here accordingly: The effector of the device applied in this study is a commercially available electromechanical hand orthosis (Amadeo, Tyromotion GmbH, Graz, Austria) which enables mass finger extension and flexion, while the wrist remains fixed without any movement (Bauer et al, 2016a, Bauer et al, 2016b). This robotic orthosis is regularly used in standard rehabilitation exercises independent of brain-interfacing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, several methods have been proposed for locating the threshold for maximum learning (Ivanova et al, 2005; Cegarra and Chevalier, 2008; Naros et al, 2016; Bauer et al, 2016a,b). Moreover, physiological parameters, e.g., distributed cortical patterns in the α-range (Vukelić et al, 2014; Vukelić and Gharabaghi, 2015a,b) and the θ-range (Fels et al, 2015) which were linked to β-band self-regulation may also be used in the long term for this purpose.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may cause frustration, which, in turn, may be exacerbated due to the low classification accuracy caused by the constrained and regularized feature space (Nijboer et al, 2008; Fels et al, 2015). In this context, we propose that difficulty adaptation be applied to overcome cognitive load issues (Bauer and Gharabaghi, 2015a; Bauer et al, 2016a,b). Such an approach may also improve the instructional efficiency of feedback (Bauer and Gharabaghi, 2015b) and maintain motivation (Bauer et al, 2016a,b).…”
Section: Methodological Adjustmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More specifically, both robot-assisted rehabilitation of proprioceptive hand function (Metzger et al, 2014) and inertial sensor-based virtual reality feedback of the arm (Wittmann et al, 2015) benefit from assessment-driven adjustments of exercise difficulty. Furthermore, a direct comparison between adaptive BRI training and non-adaptive training (Naros et al, 2016b) or sham adaptation (Bauer et al, 2016a) in healthy patients revealed the impact of reinforcement-based adaptation for the improvement of performance. Moreover, the exercise difficulty has been shown to influence the learning incentive during the training; more specifically, the optimal difficulty level could be determined empirically while disentangling the relative contribution of neurofeedback specificity and sensitivity (Bauer et al, 2016b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%