2015
DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/20153205003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closed-Loop Autofocus Scheme for Scanning Electron Microscope

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper, we present a full scale autofocus approach for scanning electron microscope (SEM). The optimal focus (in-focus) position of the microscope is achieved by maximizing the image sharpness using a vision-based closed-loop control scheme. An iterative optimization algorithm has been designed using the sharpness score derived from image gradient information. The proposed method has been implemented and validated using a tungsten gun SEM at various experimental conditions like varying raster … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is obvious that the focus of the electron beam has an influence on the measurement of the diameter of a NP. Nevertheless, the adjustment of such a parameter can depend on the operator in some cases [27,28]. In this section we consider a situation in which the focus is not properly adjusted, in order to investigate its effect on the measurement result.…”
Section: Influence Of Scan Speed and Noise Reduction Param-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is obvious that the focus of the electron beam has an influence on the measurement of the diameter of a NP. Nevertheless, the adjustment of such a parameter can depend on the operator in some cases [27,28]. In this section we consider a situation in which the focus is not properly adjusted, in order to investigate its effect on the measurement result.…”
Section: Influence Of Scan Speed and Noise Reduction Param-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical modeling performed by us demonstrated that the sensitivity of the microscope with one probe was much worse. This can be explained by lacking of the additional interference energy flux formed in the counterpropagating evanescent fields of two probes [8] and providing deeper penetration into the examined medium as well as by the increased sensitivity in comparison with conventional technologies of measurements [10,11].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The precision of focus measure f ε ∼ is calculated from pseudo images under each condition of SNR and pattern frequency Q by using equations (7). To assure consistency with the simulation results in section 4.1 [2], precision is normalized by the height of the curve.…”
Section: Relationship Between Precision Of Focus Measure ε F Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To find the maximum position of the focus measure, it uses a gradient ascent of the focus measures. The dynamic approach may reduce the number of images acquired for auto-focus [7]. However, it needs an almost-perfect focus-measure shape, which is often not the case in regard to SEM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%