1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0005-1098(99)00022-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closed-loop identification revisited

Abstract: Technical reports from the Automatic Control group in Linkping are available by anonymous ftp at the address 130.236.20.24 (ftp.control.isy.liu.se). This report is contained in the compressed postscript le 1959.ps.Z. Closed-loop Identi cation Revisited ?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
362
0
7

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 630 publications
(373 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
362
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative expression which characterizes the bias introduced by an erroneous noise model can be found in Forssell and Ljung (1999).…”
Section: The Bias Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative expression which characterizes the bias introduced by an erroneous noise model can be found in Forssell and Ljung (1999).…”
Section: The Bias Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the standard identification problem, the PEM estimate is not consistent here unless the noise model is identified correctly. Similar to the case of closed-loop identification [9], a tailor-made parameterization can be used to find a consistent estimate. If a tailor-made parametrization is used, where H(θ, ρ) = K(ρ)H(θ), the estimation error is asymptotically…”
Section: Identification Of the Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1]) typically requires a stabilizing controller. The selection of the controller needs some knowledge on the system prior to the identification experiment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%