2010
DOI: 10.15388/informatica.2010.280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closed-Loop System Identification with Modifications of the Instrumental Variable Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consider a causal, linear, and time-invariant, discrete-time system with output signal {y(k)} and plant input signal {u(k)}, shown in Fig. 1 and expressed by the equations (Atanasov and Ichtev, 2009;Forsell and Ljung, 1999;Gilson and Van den Hof, 2003)…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Consider a causal, linear, and time-invariant, discrete-time system with output signal {y(k)} and plant input signal {u(k)}, shown in Fig. 1 and expressed by the equations (Atanasov and Ichtev, 2009;Forsell and Ljung, 1999;Gilson and Van den Hof, 2003)…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It could be emphasized that, before the closed-loop indirect parametric identification the respective identifiability conditions should be satisfied according to Atanasov and Ichtev (2009), Vuchkov (1996), Isermann (1984.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The operation of dynamic systems is accompanied by random phenomena of a varying nature that reflect their functioning peculiarities. By analyzing the signals that describe the properties of these stochastic phenomena, one can recognize the states of dynamic systems (Atanasov et al, 2010;Pupeikis, 2010). We can find out whether the operation mode is normal or of pre-emergency state, dangerous and trustful.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%