2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-7542-1_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closed-Loop Turbulence Control-From Human to Machine Learning (and Retour)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The learning time may also be contrasted with machine learning control (MLC) based on genetic programming requiring thousands of runs. Intriguingly, MLC simulations and experiments (Noack 2019) indicate that most feedback mechanisms and associated control are simple and react on well-defined events or on oscillatory coherent structures. These findings encourage cluster-based control also for experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The learning time may also be contrasted with machine learning control (MLC) based on genetic programming requiring thousands of runs. Intriguingly, MLC simulations and experiments (Noack 2019) indicate that most feedback mechanisms and associated control are simple and react on well-defined events or on oscillatory coherent structures. These findings encourage cluster-based control also for experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After, the forced CNM (C 4)–(C 7) is identified, a regression solver can be employed to optimize the control law with respect to a cost function. Genetic programming has proven to be a powerful method for this method in dozens of turbulence control experiments (Noack 2019). We remark that the deterministic–stochastic network dynamics rules out ‘simple’ control design based on local linearizations, but requires the numerical solution of a non-convect nonlinear optimization problem.…”
Section: Figure 30mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After, the forced CNM (C 4)–(C 7) is identified, a regression solver can be employed to optimize the control law with respect to a cost function. Genetic programming has proven to be a powerful method for this method in dozens of turbulence control experiments (Noack 2019).…”
Section: Figure 30mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These values are adopted from a previous MLC jet mixing study in the same facility with a single minijet (Wu et al 2018a). The parameters are identical or close to the ones employed in numerous experimental studies as summarized by and Noack (2019). Elitism is set to N e = 1, i.e.…”
Section: Parameters and Control Landscapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A new model-free self-learning approach for general nonlinear control laws has been developed by Dracopoulos (1997) for commanding satellite motion and was rediscovered in fluid mechanics as machine learning control or MLC (Gautier et al 2015). A review of dozens of MLC experiments and simulations is provided by Noack (2019). The first MLC experiment was set to enhancing shear-layer mixing with 96 jet actuators driven in unison and 25 hot-wire sensors for feedback control (Parezanović et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%