2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11123-014-0386-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closed-skew normality in stochastic frontiers with individual effects and long/short-run efficiency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
252
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(256 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
252
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Starting from the Colombi et al (2014) SF model, we introduce a new element of analysis: the determinants of inefficiency. We consider the following hospital production frontier model:…”
Section: A Closed Skew-normal Sf Model With Determinants Of Transientmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Starting from the Colombi et al (2014) SF model, we introduce a new element of analysis: the determinants of inefficiency. We consider the following hospital production frontier model:…”
Section: A Closed Skew-normal Sf Model With Determinants Of Transientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although most SF models fail to consider simultaneously unobserved heterogeneity and persistent and transient inefficiencies, Colombi, Kumbhakar, Martini, and Vittadini (2014) recently presented an SF model that includes all these components in the error term, together with the normally distributed random shock. The possibility to disentangle the two types of inefficiencies, hospital unobserved heterogeneity and random shocks, comes from previous results (Dominguez-Molina, Gonzáles-Farías, & Ramos-Quiroga, 2004;Gonzáles-Farías, Dominguez-Molina, & Gupta, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The models proposed by Kumbhakar (1991), Kumbhakar and Heshmati (1995), Hjalmarsson (1993, 1995) treat firm effects as persistent inefficiency and include another component to capture time varying technical inefficiency and thus do not account for the heterogeneity effects. The task of estimating these two inefficiencies while also allowing for firm-effects heterogeneity is undertaken in Tsionas and Kumbhakar (2012) and Colombi et al (2014). The model proposed by these authors can be written as (see Kumbhakar et al, 2012): 10 Colombi et al (2014) have clarified the difference between persistent and time-varying inefficiencies by giving an example of a hospital which has more capacity (beds) than the optimal required level, but downsizing may be a long-run process due to social pressure.…”
Section: (Iii) Models With Persistent and Time Varying Inefficienciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these and couple of other studies which explicitly account for 'persistent' (time-invariant) and 'transient' (time varying) inefficiencies, (eg. Colombi et al, 2014) utilise JLMS transformation (Jondrow et al, 1982) to derive the inefficiency scores. As shown in Schmidt and Sickles (1984) the JLMS estimator is not consistent in that the conditional mean or mode of the random variable representing inefficiency component (u) given the composite error (v-u) term, that is, u v u − never approaches u even when the number of cross-sectional units tends to infinity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contribution of this paper is two-fold: firstly, we estimate the persistent and transient efficiency in electricity consumption of a large sample of Swiss households and demonstrate an application of the newly developed GTREM model (Colombi et al, 2014;Filippini and Greene, 2016) that estimates both types of efficiency conveniently by a simulated maximum likelihood approach. We benefit from a unique panel dataset covering a five-year period collected via a household survey conducted in 2015.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%