2007
DOI: 10.1309/p155-6428-5484-u0q1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closed-Tube SNP Genotyping Without Labeled Probes/A Comparison Between Unlabeled Probe and Amplicon Melting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method has been applied to many common clinical single-base variants 43 and compared against dual-hybridization probes 44 and unlabeled probes. 45 However, many small insertions/deletions and some single base changes can be difficult to distinguish from wild type when homozygous. For example, bp neutral single base changes with nearest neighbor symmetry are predicted to have identical Tms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method has been applied to many common clinical single-base variants 43 and compared against dual-hybridization probes 44 and unlabeled probes. 45 However, many small insertions/deletions and some single base changes can be difficult to distinguish from wild type when homozygous. For example, bp neutral single base changes with nearest neighbor symmetry are predicted to have identical Tms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional closed tube methods that do not require labeled probes include snapback primers 8 and unlabeled probes. 3 SNE by high resolution melting has the advantage over these aforementioned methods in that it directly identifies the base substitution at a particular position, which would be most useful for nucleotide positions that are particularly variable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genotyping for each assay was based on the melting pattern of the extension products, taken from the derivative melting temperature plots of the raw LS32 data. Melting temperatures and curves were calculated using both the analysis software from the LS32 as well as custom software previously used 3 in high resolution melting analysis.…”
Section: Genotypingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations