2004
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m406647200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closely Related Mammals Have Distinct Asialoglycoprotein Receptor Carbohydrate Specificities

Abstract: We recently reported that the rat asialoglycoprotein receptor binds oligosaccharides terminating with sialic acid (Sia) ␣2,6GalNAc. Despite a high percentage of identical amino acids in their sequences, orthologues of the asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGP-R) in different mammals differ in their specificity for terminal Sia␣2,6GalNAc. The recombinant subunit 1 of the ASGP-R from the rat (RHL-1 or rat hepatic lectin) and the mouse (MHL-1 or mouse hepatic lectin), which differ at only 12 positions in the amino ac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our case, the positional effect of sialylation is revealed by comparatively analyzing the two sets of sialylated N-glycans. Historically, following its discovery the hepatic asialoglycoprotein receptor has been shown to tolerate a2,6-sialylation as branch-end modification, with species-dependent differences (Park and Baenziger, 2004;Park et al, 2005). Marked differences in serum clearance and hepatic content were thus detected between N-glycans with a2,3-or a2,6-sialylation, and an influence of core substitution for a2,6-sialylated N-glycans was noted ( Figure 5, middle and bottom).…”
Section: Will Core Substitutions Modulate Cell Binding?mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In our case, the positional effect of sialylation is revealed by comparatively analyzing the two sets of sialylated N-glycans. Historically, following its discovery the hepatic asialoglycoprotein receptor has been shown to tolerate a2,6-sialylation as branch-end modification, with species-dependent differences (Park and Baenziger, 2004;Park et al, 2005). Marked differences in serum clearance and hepatic content were thus detected between N-glycans with a2,3-or a2,6-sialylation, and an influence of core substitution for a2,6-sialylated N-glycans was noted ( Figure 5, middle and bottom).…”
Section: Will Core Substitutions Modulate Cell Binding?mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Both types of receptors form homo-oligomer/heterooligomer, permitting recognition of a broad range of glycans containing terminal hGal, hGalNAc, or aGalNAc (39, 50). The ASGPR was also recently reported to recognize Siaa2-6GalNAch1-2Man (51).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ASGPR mediates the binding and removal of glycoconjugates having exposed ␤Gal and GalNAc, 32 although recognition of SA␣2,6GalNAc and SA␣2,6Gal has also been reported. 33,34 The binding affinity of the ASGPR subtypes on hepatocytes or macrophages depends on ligand valency, spatial arrangement, and size. 35,36 Small ligands (Ͻ 70 nm) are thought to be preferentially internalized via the hepatocyte ASGPR-mediated endocytic pathway.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%