1993
DOI: 10.1029/93rs01079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closely spaced monopoles for mobile communications

Abstract: The spatial cross‐correlation function for antenna signals in multipath environments depends on the mutual coupling between the antennas. In general, this function is different from the spatial autocorrelation coefficient function of the multipath, fading field. This difference influences the design criteria for the element spacing of compact (that is, closely spaced elements) antennas. The relationship between the spatial autocorrelation function and the cross‐correlation function is presented and used for pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is no disagreement in the impact of mutual coupling on correlation or diversity gain [9]- [15] and radiation efficiency [11], [16]. On the other hand, conflicting views arise on the impact of mutual coupling on capacity performance [13]- [20], with some papers claiming mutual coupling effects to be beneficial for capacity [13], while others either completely disagree [14], [18], [19], or indicate that its benefits apply only to selected cases (e.g.…”
Section: Review Of Array Impedance Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is no disagreement in the impact of mutual coupling on correlation or diversity gain [9]- [15] and radiation efficiency [11], [16]. On the other hand, conflicting views arise on the impact of mutual coupling on capacity performance [13]- [20], with some papers claiming mutual coupling effects to be beneficial for capacity [13], while others either completely disagree [14], [18], [19], or indicate that its benefits apply only to selected cases (e.g.…”
Section: Review Of Array Impedance Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small spatial separation of the antennas not only leads to correlation of the associated signals, but also gives rise to electromagnetic interactions among the antennas (or mutual coupling), which in turn distorts antenna characteristics such as radiation pattern and input impedance [9], [10]. This distortion can impact the capacity of MIMO systems in two ways: (i) it can introduce (or add to) dissimilarity between the antenna patterns and thus reduce signal correlation to a degree; (ii) it can induce a loss of radiation efficiency due to an increase in impedance mismatch between the typically 50Ω feed line and the antenna input.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, increasing the number of antennas results in more reduction in channel fading. However, in practice, 10-20 antennas seem to provide satisfactory results [6].…”
Section: Diversity Combining Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of two diversity antennas the network is two port so the transfer matrix can be resolved when the Z parameters are converted to S parameters [12] giving more clarity compared to the equations used by Vaughan and Scott [8]: The transfer matrix clearly outlines the power transfer components, s fn , and the isolation components s r . It is now possible to compare the equivalent E-field voltages so that: (13) such that:…”
Section: Effects Of Coupling On Spatial Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where δθ is defined in equation (8). This can be simplified and used to derive the angle, ζ, as follows: …”
Section: Appendix 1 -Derivation Of the Three Dimensional Anglementioning
confidence: 99%