2013
DOI: 10.1002/elps.201200514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closer look at the operating definition of protein recovery in CE

Abstract: Analyte recovery is an important figure to assess protein adsorption on fused-silica capillaries. In 1991 Regnier and coworkers estimated recovery by assuming the loss of analyte from adsorption and thus the decrease in peak area measured by two detectors to be proportional to the length of the capillary section between them. In this report we closely examine this concept and its adaptation to commercial CE instruments to determine protein recovery. We hypothesize that, once a steady-state migration is reached… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…), suggesting not only that a slow adsorption‐desorption factor is involved but also that such kinetic effect surpassed that of solute overloading, if at all. This behavior, described profusely elsewhere, is characteristic of compact high p I proteins such as lysozyme . Notice also that the extent of this effect is very notorious in the case of PrOH‐modified capillaries.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…), suggesting not only that a slow adsorption‐desorption factor is involved but also that such kinetic effect surpassed that of solute overloading, if at all. This behavior, described profusely elsewhere, is characteristic of compact high p I proteins such as lysozyme . Notice also that the extent of this effect is very notorious in the case of PrOH‐modified capillaries.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…To further complement our observations, such residual adsorption can be quantitatively assessed by analyte recovery measurements. This is accomplished by linear fitting of logarithmic peak area vs. effective length data (42). For a given tube id the slope, k , is proportional to the surface density of adsorption sites and, hence, is a useful figure to comparatively assess protein adsorption on different capillary coatings.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible adsorption of the peptides to the channel wall was estimated by recovery studies according to a method adapted from Preisler et al 49 and described in detail by Tran et al 50 This equation is in accordance with the more general one proposed by Espinal et al for any distance employed. 51 The recovery of Ab 1-38, 1-40 and 1-42 amyloid peptides was determined by analyzing them individually at a concentration of 20 mM and by comparing the peak areas obtained during the same analysis at two detection points (35 mm and 70 mm).…”
Section: Recovery Calibration Curve and Lodmentioning
confidence: 99%