2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-009-5027-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closing-in behaviour in fronto-temporal dementia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As additional evidence, Conson et al 24 reported that the degree of the closing-in phenomenon is independent of the visuospatial function in patients with corticobasal ganglia degeneration or focal frontal lobe lesions. 22,24 In our study, the closing-in phenomenon was correlated relationship with atrophy of bilateral orbito-frontal areas, which supports the attraction hypothesis that the closing-in phenomenon occurs due to frontal lobe dysfunction as a part of a primitive reflex rather than the compensation hypothesis, which states that it occurs due to visuo-spatial dysfunction associated with the parietal lobe.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As additional evidence, Conson et al 24 reported that the degree of the closing-in phenomenon is independent of the visuospatial function in patients with corticobasal ganglia degeneration or focal frontal lobe lesions. 22,24 In our study, the closing-in phenomenon was correlated relationship with atrophy of bilateral orbito-frontal areas, which supports the attraction hypothesis that the closing-in phenomenon occurs due to frontal lobe dysfunction as a part of a primitive reflex rather than the compensation hypothesis, which states that it occurs due to visuo-spatial dysfunction associated with the parietal lobe.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…They reported that the closing-in phenomenon is correlated with the visuo-spatial functions rather than frontal lobe functions; thus, supporting the compensation hypothesis. 21 In contrast, Ambron et al 22 reported that the closing-in phenomenon occurs increasingly when patients with AD attempt to draw a complex figure. These authors also found no correlation between the degree of complexity and closing-in in patients with fronto-temporal dementia (FTD).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…One more recent study [25] confirmed that CI is more frequent in AD with respect to VaD patients, and that the two patient groups also tended to show qualitatively different CI phenomena, as AD patients more often overlapped at least one element of the copy onto the model (adherent-CI), whereas VaD patients more often drew close to the model without overlapping onto it (near-CI). On the other hand, one retrospective study showed that CI is as frequent in AD as in FTD patients, but did not provide qualitative observations [187]. Indeed, in a sample of patients with the behavioral variant of FTD, near-CI has been observed more frequently than adherent-CI, and was often (but not obligatorily) associated with other imitation and utilization behaviors [188].…”
Section: Closing-inmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In addition, Ambron et al (2009a;2009b) proposed the assessment of CI independently from CA in order to investigate possible dissociation between these symptoms. Thanks to this method, they were able to classify CI within a more general disturbance of action and to demonstrate that CI can be associated with good constructional skills in some patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)(n=13/33 MCI patients with CI (Ambron, McIntosh, Finotto, Clerici, Mariani, & Della Sala 2012a).…”
Section: Section 3)mentioning
confidence: 99%