While the concept of organizational identity is regarded as a sanctuary for all the different voices and perceptions of an organization, the field itself seems to consist of deeply ingrained and dominant preferences for what constitutes meaningful organizational identity research. In this paper, I question two of these characteristics of the field: the lack of quantitative studies and the sole focus on the more socially constructed perceived organizational identity. I argue that a more open approach to organizational identity research is crucial, since it is only by straying off the main research paths that we will discover unexplored areas and develop new perspectives on organizational identity.