2008
DOI: 10.1080/1097198x.2008.10856458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closing the Digital Divide: The Role of Community Based Non-Profit Organizations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, issues concerning the digital divide have received significant attention in academic research (e.g., NTIA, 1995NTIA, , 1998NTIA, , 1999DiMaggio, Hargittai, Neuman, & Robinson, 2001;Sciadas, 2002;Sciadas, 2005;Dewan & Riggins, 2005;Cuervo & Menéndez, 2006;Deichmann et al, 2006;van Dijk, 2006;Fryer & Grander, 2008;Ayanso, Cho, & Lertwachara, 2010;Ayanso, Cho, & Lertwachara, 2014). The concept of the digital divide was originally used to describe the gap in Internet access between rural and urban areas of the United States, and particularly considered the lack of access to online resources for the following groups: minorities, the elderly, and people with lower incomes, lower levels of education, and people with disabilities (Hoffman & Novak, 1998;Norris, 2001;Sciadas, 2002).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, issues concerning the digital divide have received significant attention in academic research (e.g., NTIA, 1995NTIA, , 1998NTIA, , 1999DiMaggio, Hargittai, Neuman, & Robinson, 2001;Sciadas, 2002;Sciadas, 2005;Dewan & Riggins, 2005;Cuervo & Menéndez, 2006;Deichmann et al, 2006;van Dijk, 2006;Fryer & Grander, 2008;Ayanso, Cho, & Lertwachara, 2010;Ayanso, Cho, & Lertwachara, 2014). The concept of the digital divide was originally used to describe the gap in Internet access between rural and urban areas of the United States, and particularly considered the lack of access to online resources for the following groups: minorities, the elderly, and people with lower incomes, lower levels of education, and people with disabilities (Hoffman & Novak, 1998;Norris, 2001;Sciadas, 2002).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, Sarrocco (2002), advocates broadening access in developed countries from the urban areas (where it is currently) to the rural areas. Fryer and Granger (2008) stress that all populations, regardless of location, benefit from closing the gap in the global digital divide. Purcell and Toland (2004) indicate that a major challenge of the new millennium is to make certain that all world citizens benefit from open access to ICTs.…”
Section: Implications Of the Global Digital Dividementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However access alone, although necessary, is not sufficient. Fryer and Granger (2008) contend that to adequate address the global digital divide, the emphasis has to change from access alone to using digital technology for empowerment. Access to ICTs provides rural populations with access to information that enhances their ability to access and provide education, conduct commerce and to interact with the world at large.…”
Section: Implications Of the Global Digital Dividementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large nonprofits could thus commandeer the resources better than the small, community-based nonprofits. Some scholars have even argued that there is a digital divide within the nonprofit sector between large nonprofits and smaller nonprofits (Fryer and Granger, 2008;McNutt and Menon, 2008).…”
Section: The Dartmouth Center For Marketing Research At the Universitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rogers (2003) indicates that organizations adopt innovations based on how compatible the technology is with the needs of the organization and how the technology fulfills organizational goals and mission (Fryer and Granger, 2008;Guthrie, Preston and Sbarbaro, 2004). Innovations can be best assimilated when the innovation is aligned with top management goals and fits the mission of the organization (Young, 2012).…”
Section: Cognitive Compatibility Is Related To What People Think or Fmentioning
confidence: 99%