2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10956-008-9134-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closing the Gap: Inquiry in Research and the Secondary Science Classroom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
27
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The National Research Council () describes the process of inquiry as multifaceted activities, including conducting observations, defining the problem, verifying or reviewing the information, and making conclusions. Gengarelly and Abrams () found that students who experienced inquiry instruction demonstrated better ability to interpret data than those who did not experience inquiry instruction. Thus, inquiry instruction can promote knowledge construction and enhance students' understanding of the nature of science and learning (e.g., Ben‐David & Zohar, ; Eslinger, White, Frederiksen, & Brobst, ; Gengarelly & Abrams, ; Hmelo, Duncan, & Chinn, ; Manlove, Lazonder, & de Jong, ; Slotta & Linn, ; Zuckerman & Chudinova, ).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The National Research Council () describes the process of inquiry as multifaceted activities, including conducting observations, defining the problem, verifying or reviewing the information, and making conclusions. Gengarelly and Abrams () found that students who experienced inquiry instruction demonstrated better ability to interpret data than those who did not experience inquiry instruction. Thus, inquiry instruction can promote knowledge construction and enhance students' understanding of the nature of science and learning (e.g., Ben‐David & Zohar, ; Eslinger, White, Frederiksen, & Brobst, ; Gengarelly & Abrams, ; Hmelo, Duncan, & Chinn, ; Manlove, Lazonder, & de Jong, ; Slotta & Linn, ; Zuckerman & Chudinova, ).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The challenge originates from the teacher's scant experience of student-centered learning through inquiry and suggests that it is not so easy for teachers who have been taught by teacher-centered instruction to employ a different manner of instruction when requested to change their paradigm (Kask et al, 2008). In this light, Gengarelly & Abrams (2009) reported that teacher-scientist partnerships were an effective mean to ensure teachers' professional development.…”
Section: Inquiry Teaching and Its Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gengarelly and Abrams (2008) suggest that inquiry-based learning is essential for students to develop scientific literacy. They claim that it supports improved student understanding of science concepts, and that engaging in the process of doing science improves students' understanding of the nature of science, teaches them how to question things and formulate their own explanations, and improves students' attitudes towards science.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%