2004
DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2003.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closure of central defects of the forefoot with external fixation: a case report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Key data extracted from the metaanalyses and controlled studies are presented in the evidence table in Table S2. Twelve non-controlled studies from our previous systematic review [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] were excluded because they were case studies or otherwise did not fit the scope. Results are presented separately for each outcome and intervention group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Key data extracted from the metaanalyses and controlled studies are presented in the evidence table in Table S2. Twelve non-controlled studies from our previous systematic review [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] were excluded because they were case studies or otherwise did not fit the scope. Results are presented separately for each outcome and intervention group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Oznur and Tokgozoglu reported a case utilising an Ilizarov frame for a resection of the third and fourth rays due to dry gangrene. 7 One major difference is the use of an osteotomy in the fifth ray to ease closure. Narrowing of the forefoot was accomplished with the olive wires under dynamometric tension.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These authors contend that their half-ring construct is less bulky, less expensive, and more easily tolerated. 7 Bernstein and Guerin utilized rail external fixation similar to our constuct. 3 They, however, closed the deficit in a staged protocol.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…External fixation devices can reduce the size of large cleft wounds to facilitate long-lasting wound closure and a more functional limb. 69,70 External fixation to achieve reduction of the remaining intermetatarsal space can be combined with either delayed primary closure or split thickness skin grafting to obtain long-lasting wound closure.…”
Section: Soft Tissue Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%