2018
DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.117.020030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale Versus Medical Therapy in Patients With Cryptogenic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
64
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
64
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings were consistent with the findings of one recent meta‐analysis of 5 RCTs . We added all high‐quality observational studies in our meta‐analysis, which showed more general efficacy from PFO closure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our findings were consistent with the findings of one recent meta‐analysis of 5 RCTs . We added all high‐quality observational studies in our meta‐analysis, which showed more general efficacy from PFO closure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In contrary, the results from recent RCTs showed a lower risk of recurrent stroke when PFO was closed comparing to medical therapy . This finding has been supported by a meta‐analysis of RCTs recently …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are two options for prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke, including medical antithrombotic agents and catheter closure of the defect. Transcatheter PFO closure reveals less recurrent ischemic stroke compared to medical treatment [8]. In another multinational randomized trial, PFO closure combined with antiplatelet therapy revealed less subsequent ischemic stroke (1.4%) compared to antiplatelet alone (5.4%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The study was funded by the French Ministry of Health. In summary, the CLOSE study shows a therapeutic benefit of Table 1 Design and baseline data from the six randomised studies on PFO closure in cryptogenic stroke [9,11,23 PFO closure versus drug therapy alone in a patent foramen ovale with large shunt volume or atrial septal aneurysm in patients aged below 60 years with cryptogenic stroke, and no difference between anticoagulation and APT. The REDUCE study compared the closure of a patent foramen ovale with subsequent APT, with therapy with APT alone in patients with patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke [8].…”
Section: Recent Randomised Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%