Cloud Cover Archiving on a Global Scale: A Discussion of Principles

Abstract

Monitoring of climatic variability and climate modeling both require a reliable global cloud data set. Examination is made of the temporal and spatial variability of cloudiness in light of recommendations made by GARP in 1975 (and updated by JOC in 1978 and 1980) for cloud data archiving. An examination of the methods of comparing cloud cover frequency curves suggests that the use of the beta distribution not only facilitates objective comparisons, but also reduces overall storage requirements. A specific study of the only current global cloud climatology (the U.S. Air Force's 3-dimensional nephanalysis) over the United Kingdom indicates that discussion of methods of validating satellite-based data sets is urgently required.

Monitoring the Level of Light Pollution and Its Impact on Astronomical Bodies Naked-Eye Visibility Range in Selected Areas in Malaysia Using Sky Quality Meter

“…The high reflectivity of cloud reduces the amount of incoming solar radiation absorbed by the Earth-atmosphere system by increasing the albedo. Henderson describes the relationship between cloud and radiation of the sky by [24]:…”

Short‐wave radiation and sea ice in Baffin Bay

“…The distributions of low resolution climatological (Fig. 7c) and satellite cloud data are shifted toward a bell-shaped distribution (Shine and Crane, 1984;Henderson-Sellers et al, 1981). The instantaneous CMC-3H and the six-hourly mean NCEP-6H cloud amount data are compared in terms of the percentage of cloudy periods during daylight, defined above the threshold of 0.5 (Fig.…”

Intercomparison of satellite-derived cloud analyses for the Arctic Ocean in spring and summer

“…In part this reflects the statistical effect of the scale of resolution of the data (Henderson-Sellers et al 1981). Station observations of cloud amount tend to be bimodal (presence, absence) whereas 5°grid boxes have a J-shaped frequency distribution.…”