2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.01.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cloud service evaluation method-based Multi-Criteria Decision-Making: A systematic literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, aggregate DMs' linguistic evaluations into collective ones by Equation (11) The aggregated decision matrix is shown in Table 5. Furthermore, we convert Z-fuzzy performance values to TFNs by Equations (4) and (7). The comprehensive decision matrix X , which is combined with the performance values of quantitative criteria, is obtained as follows:…”
Section: Scale Membership Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Then, aggregate DMs' linguistic evaluations into collective ones by Equation (11) The aggregated decision matrix is shown in Table 5. Furthermore, we convert Z-fuzzy performance values to TFNs by Equations (4) and (7). The comprehensive decision matrix X , which is combined with the performance values of quantitative criteria, is obtained as follows:…”
Section: Scale Membership Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a 1 (5,7,9) (0.7,0.9,1) (5,7,9) (0.7,0.9,1) (1,3,5) (0.3,0.5,0.7) a 2 (1,3,5) (0.9,1,1) (5,7,9) (0.7,0.9,1) (7,9,10) (0.1,0.3,0.5) a 3 (0,1,3) (0.3,0.5,0.7) (7,9,10) (0.7,0.9,1) (7,9,10) (0.3,0.5,0.7) a 4 (9,10,10) (0.5,0.7,0.9) (5,7,9) (0.5,0.7,0.9) (1,3,5) (0.7,0.9,1) DM2 a 1 (3,5,7) (0.7,0.9,1) (7,9,10) (0.9,1,1) (1,3,5) (0.3,0.5,0.7) a 2 (1,3,5) (0.7,0.9,1) (7,9,10) (0.7,0.9,1) (7,9,10) (0.3,0.5,0.7) a 3 (1,3,5) (0.3,0.5,0.7) (5,7,9) (0.7,0.9,1) (7,9,10) (0.5,0.7,0.9) a 4 (9,10,10) (0.5,0.7,0.9) (5,7,9) (0.5,0.7,0.9) (1,3,5) (0.7,0.9,1) DM3 a 1 (5,7,9) (0.7,0.9,1) (7,9,10) (0.9,1,1) (3,5,7) (0.1,0.3,0.5) a 2 (1,3,5) (0.7,0.9,1) (5,7,9) (0.7,0.9,1) (7,9,10) (0.5,0.7,0.9) a 3 (0,1,3) (0.3,0.5,0.7) (7,9,10) (0.7,0.9,1) (7,9,10) (0.5,0.7,0.9) a 4 (9,10,10) (0.3,0.5,0.7) (3,5,7) (0.7,0.9,1) (1,3,5) (0.7,0.9,1) ((1, 3, 5), (0.767, 0.933, 1)) ((5.667, 7.667, 9.333), (0.7, 0.9, 1)) ((7, 9, 10), (0.3, 0.5, 0.7)) a 3 ((0.333, 1.667, 3.667), (0.3, 0.5, 0.7)) ((6.333, 8.333, 9.667), (0.7, 0.9, 1)) ((7, 9, 10), (0.433, 0.633, 0.833)) a 4 ((9, 10, 10), (0.433, 0.633, 0.833)) ((4.333, 6.333, 8.333), (0.567, 0.767, 0.933)) ((1, 3, 5), (0.7, 0.9, 1))…”
Section: Dm1mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…e QoS-aware cloud service selection problem can be considered as a MCDM problem [13]. Multiple methods has been proposed by researchers to evaluate cloud services [4,6,14].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Testing-as-a-Service (TaaS) based on cloud platform provides automated software testing services, saving capacity and reducing expense [1,2]. With the increasing popularity of service computing, a vast amount of services-related business applications has emerged, such as service composition [3,4], service recommendation [5][6][7][8], service evaluation [9][10][11], and service optimization [12][13][14][15]. As an important guarantee to the QoS (Quality of Service), such as test effectiveness and efficiency, service optimization has attracted much attention of researchers in software engineering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%