2019
DOI: 10.1177/1391561419850300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Club Convergence among the Major Indian States During 1982–2014: Does Investment in Human Capital Matter?

Abstract: The objective of this study is to investigate the presence of ‘club convergence’ in respect of income among 15 major states in India during 1982–2014 using Markov chain along with stochastic kernel. The distributional dynamics observed among the major states support the process of ‘club convergence’. The empirical findings prove the hypotheses that economies that are similar in their structural characteristics and initial per capita income levels will converge with each other in per capita terms in the long ru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Indian context, the imbalanced economic performance among the regions has also attracted substantial interest among researchers, policymakers and planners. As a result, several empirical studies on the convergence among Indian states/regions have been conducted (see e.g., Cashin and Sahay, 1996; Marjit and Mitra, 1996; Bajpai and Sachs, 1996; Ghosh et al , 1998; Rao et al , 1999; Nagaraj et al , 2000; Dasgupta et al , 2000; Aiyar, 2001; Sachs et al , 2002; Singh et al , 2003; Adabar, 2004; Bhattacharya and Sakthivel, 2004; Kar, and Sakthivel, 2006; Kar and Sakthivel, 2007; Nayyar, 2008; Ghosh, 2008; Das et al , 2010; Chikte, 2011; Sahoo, 2012; Kumar and Subramanian, 2012; Ghosh et al , 2013; Mallick, 2014; Cherodian and Thirlwall, 2015; Sofi and Durai, 2016; Sanga and Shaban, 2017; Chakraborty and Chakraborty, 2018; Mishra and Mishra, 2018; Hembram et al , 2019; Lolayekar and Mukhopadhyay, 2019; Lolayekar and Mukhopadhyay, 2020). Based on different samples of the states/regions over different periods, these studies give mixed results on the convergence of the Indian states/regions.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the Indian context, the imbalanced economic performance among the regions has also attracted substantial interest among researchers, policymakers and planners. As a result, several empirical studies on the convergence among Indian states/regions have been conducted (see e.g., Cashin and Sahay, 1996; Marjit and Mitra, 1996; Bajpai and Sachs, 1996; Ghosh et al , 1998; Rao et al , 1999; Nagaraj et al , 2000; Dasgupta et al , 2000; Aiyar, 2001; Sachs et al , 2002; Singh et al , 2003; Adabar, 2004; Bhattacharya and Sakthivel, 2004; Kar, and Sakthivel, 2006; Kar and Sakthivel, 2007; Nayyar, 2008; Ghosh, 2008; Das et al , 2010; Chikte, 2011; Sahoo, 2012; Kumar and Subramanian, 2012; Ghosh et al , 2013; Mallick, 2014; Cherodian and Thirlwall, 2015; Sofi and Durai, 2016; Sanga and Shaban, 2017; Chakraborty and Chakraborty, 2018; Mishra and Mishra, 2018; Hembram et al , 2019; Lolayekar and Mukhopadhyay, 2019; Lolayekar and Mukhopadhyay, 2020). Based on different samples of the states/regions over different periods, these studies give mixed results on the convergence of the Indian states/regions.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the endogenous growth theory, forces like human capital and research and development put a stop to the reduction in the marginal product of capital. Eventually, the works of Barro and Sala-i-Martin (1992) and Sala-i-Martin (1996) explore the concept of absolute β-convergence, which refers to that economies, irrespective of their initial conditions, will converge with each other (Hembram et al , 2019). There are two ways to measure the existence of convergence, i.e.…”
Section: Framework Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The kernel density estimator is a non‐parametric and common method to consider external shape of the distribution dynamics (Hembram, Maji, & Haldar, 2019). Equation () presents the formula of the kernel density function: Gfalse^B()x=1ni=1nZB()CCi=1nBi=1nZ()CCiB, where n is the number of observations, ZB=1BL()xB presents scaled kernel, B is the bandwidth C i is i th observation and C shows a particular point (Conlen, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The kernel density estimator is a non-parametric and common method to consider external shape of the distribution dynamics (Hembram, Maji, & Haldar, 2019). Equation 1presents the formula of the kernel density function:…”
Section: Kernel Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notwithstanding of existence of different tests, the above studies are only based on two clubs, which might not be the case of Indian states/UTs as they vary in PCO. Further, Ghosh et al (2013) and Hembram et al (2019) have tried to relax this assumption by implementing the clustering algorithms and Markov chain tests, respectively to identify the club convergence in per capita income across the Indian states/ UTs. The findings of these studies are not again consistent, which appeals for future research on this issue at aggregate PCO and sectoral level across the Indian states/UTs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%