2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apal.2018.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Club isomorphisms on higher Aronszajn trees

Abstract: We prove the consistency, assuming an ineffable cardinal, of the statement that CH holds and any two normal countably closed ω 2 -Aronszajn trees are club isomorphic. This work generalizes to higher cardinals the property of Abraham-Shelah [1] that any two normal ω 1 -Aronszajn trees are club isomorphic, which follows from PFA. The statement that any two normal countably closed ω 2 -Aronszajn trees are club isomorphic implies that there are no ω 2 -Suslin trees, so our proof also expands on the method of Laver… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generalizing this further, Golshani and Hayut have recently shown ( [19]), using posets which specialize with anticipation, that it is consistent that, simultaneously, for every regular cardinal κ, SATP(κ + ) holds. Krueger has generalized the result of Laver-Shelah (and also Abraham-Shelah, [2]) in a different direction ( [28]), showing that it is consistent that any two countably closed Aronszjan trees on ω 2 are club isomorphic. And finally, Asperó and Golshani ([3]) have announced a positive solution to the question of whether SATP(ω 2 ) is consistent with the GCH.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Generalizing this further, Golshani and Hayut have recently shown ( [19]), using posets which specialize with anticipation, that it is consistent that, simultaneously, for every regular cardinal κ, SATP(κ + ) holds. Krueger has generalized the result of Laver-Shelah (and also Abraham-Shelah, [2]) in a different direction ( [28]), showing that it is consistent that any two countably closed Aronszjan trees on ω 2 are club isomorphic. And finally, Asperó and Golshani ([3]) have announced a positive solution to the question of whether SATP(ω 2 ) is consistent with the GCH.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Much of this material was originally developed by Mitchell [33]. Our exposition here is a summary of what can be found in [28], Section 1, to which we refer the reader for proofs.…”
Section: Review Of Strongly Generic Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It would certainly be interesting to see to what extent our results generalize to higher cardinals above ω 1 . In particular, we mention a recent result of Krueger [13] on the club-isomorphism of higher Aronszajn trees that could substitute the Abraham-Shelah model. The construction schemes developed by Brodsky, Lambie-Hanson and Rinot [4,15,18] for higher Suslin and Aronszajn trees also seem rather relevant.…”
Section: Proof (1) Suppose Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would certainly be interesting to see to what extent our results generalise to higher cardinals above ω 1 . In particular, we mention a recent result of Krueger [13] on the club-isomorphism of higher Aronszajn trees that could substitute the Abraham-Shelah model. The construction schemes developed by Brodsky, Lambie-Hanson and Rinot [4,18,15] for higher Suslin and Aronszajn trees also seems rather relevant.…”
Section: Kurepa Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%