2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2015.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CLUMPY : Jeans analysis,γ-ray andνfluxes from dark matter (sub-)structures

Abstract: We present an update of the CLUMPY code for the calculation of the astrophysical J-factors (from dark matter annihilation/decay) for any Galactic or extragalactic dark matter halo including substructures: halo-to-halo concentration scatter may now be enabled, boost factors can include several levels of substructures, and triaxiality is a new option for dark matter haloes. This new version takes advantage of the cfitsio and HEALPix libraries to propose fits output maps using the HEALPix pixelisation scheme. Sky… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
96
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
2
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This will be particularly true as new dSphs continue to be discovered by the Dark Energy Survey [40], and even further into the future by the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope. Accounting for velocity-dependent cross sections will also be a future requirement of numerical methods that scan the theoretical parameter space given large spectroscopic data sets [41,42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This will be particularly true as new dSphs continue to be discovered by the Dark Energy Survey [40], and even further into the future by the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope. Accounting for velocity-dependent cross sections will also be a future requirement of numerical methods that scan the theoretical parameter space given large spectroscopic data sets [41,42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having incorporated these models in the CLUMPY code [35][36][37], we consider 1000 Monte Carlo realisations for each configuration, and we select all subhaloes with J (< 0.1 • ) > 10 17 GeV 2 cm −5 . The choice of this cut originates from the specific scope of this paper: To show how many subhaloes would be detectable in the Fermi-LAT catalogues, and what is the role, if any, of low-mass subhaloes.…”
Section: Galactic Subhalo Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, we do not include the contribution from subhalos in dSphs since it is still under discussion (e.g. [117,118,[133][134][135][136][137][138]). Subhalos should enhance the annihilation signal, although little subhalo boost is expected in dSphs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More detailed profiles such as non-spherical cases or profiles with substructures are discussed in Ref. [78,[116][117][118]. Table I (5)), Jfactor integrated to solid angle of 0.5 degrees (J <0.5 • ), J-factor integrated to 4.0 • × 4.0 • region (J tot ) which corresponds to the size of the region of interest (RoI) in our analyses, and distance from the Earth.…”
Section: Burkert Profile [115]mentioning
confidence: 99%