2013
DOI: 10.1109/l-ca.2012.22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clumsy Flow Control for High-Throughput Bufferless On-Chip Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, all of these previous works use routers with in-ring buffering, wormhole switching and flow control. Concurrent works by Kim et al propose tNoCs, hybrid packet-flit credit-based flow control [27] and Clumsy Flow Control (CFC) [26]. However, these two designs add additional complexity because tNoCs [27] requires an additional credit network to guarantee forward progress while CFC requires coordination between cores and memory controllers.…”
Section: E Comparison Against Other Ring Configurationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, all of these previous works use routers with in-ring buffering, wormhole switching and flow control. Concurrent works by Kim et al propose tNoCs, hybrid packet-flit credit-based flow control [27] and Clumsy Flow Control (CFC) [26]. However, these two designs add additional complexity because tNoCs [27] requires an additional credit network to guarantee forward progress while CFC requires coordination between cores and memory controllers.…”
Section: E Comparison Against Other Ring Configurationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, flow control in HiRD is lightweight (with deflection based flow control, the Retransmit-Once mechanism, and simpler local-to-global and global-to-local buffers). Additionally, throttling decisions in HiRD can be made locally in each local ring as opposed to global decisions in CFC [26] and tNoCs [27].…”
Section: E Comparison Against Other Ring Configurationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It remains to be seen if PQS can be extended to provide QoS support. Source throttling [52,19] has been proposed to prevent buffer congestion but these have been proposed on top of conventional, buffered flow control or bufferless networks. Grot et al [13] also proposed a hybrid flow control in their kilo-NoC but their hybrid flow control combined elastic-buffered flow control with minimal VC flow control.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work [1,[20][21][22] uses source throttling, or constraining applications' network request rates, to reduce deflection rates and improve overall system throughput. Nychis et al [1] propose the BLESS-Throttling (BLESS-T) algorithm to mitigate congestion by limiting traffic from NoC-insensitive applications.…”
Section: Bufferless Nocsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ausavarungnirun et al [20] propose an application-aware mechanism, Adaptive Cluster Throttling (ACT), to improve throughput and fairness by throttling clusters of application. Kim et al [21] propose Clumsy Flow Control (CFC) to degrade network congestion by implementing credit-based flow control in bufferless NoCs.…”
Section: Bufferless Nocsmentioning
confidence: 99%