1983
DOI: 10.2307/3151680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cluster Analysis in Marketing Research: Review and Suggestions for Application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
330
0
16

Year Published

1986
1986
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,313 publications
(350 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
4
330
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…Examination of the dendrograms, agglomeration plots, and changes in agglomeration coefficients for the complete-linkage, average linkage, and Ward's method algorithms supported a five-cluster solution. Upon comparison of hierarchical algorithm results, the Ward's method best fit the data, which is consistent with scholars' preference for the Ward's method [9,36]. Average values of the 14 standardized classification variables for each of these five solution groups were used as initial seeds for a nonhierarchical cluster analysis, the solution of which produced five groups with 45, 39, 16, 9, and 5 members, respectively.…”
Section: Taxonomic Analysissupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Examination of the dendrograms, agglomeration plots, and changes in agglomeration coefficients for the complete-linkage, average linkage, and Ward's method algorithms supported a five-cluster solution. Upon comparison of hierarchical algorithm results, the Ward's method best fit the data, which is consistent with scholars' preference for the Ward's method [9,36]. Average values of the 14 standardized classification variables for each of these five solution groups were used as initial seeds for a nonhierarchical cluster analysis, the solution of which produced five groups with 45, 39, 16, 9, and 5 members, respectively.…”
Section: Taxonomic Analysissupporting
confidence: 58%
“…A two-stage approach used the results of the optimal hierarchical solution as initial cluster centroids for a nonhierarchical cluster analysis [35,36]. The final K-means cluster solution was tested for reliability through comparison of results across multiple cluster analyses, including solutions from the hierarchical algorithms and solutions using different approaches to address variable standardization and multicollinearity.…”
Section: Taxonomic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early applications of market segmentation through cluster analysis seemed to grow rapidly ahead of the empirical understanding of the technique and without a firm theoretical basis. Punj and Stewart (1983) provided clarification on this issue in an effort to alleviate the confusion by producing a series of guidelines on the appropriate application of cluster analysis. However, Dibb and Stern (1995) express persisting concerns related to the reliability of segmentation solutions based on cluster analysis, arguing that researchers need to ensure that their approach is based on theoretical principles to avoid spurious results.…”
Section: Overview Of Segmentation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The kmeans algorithm is perhaps the most popular method for non-overlapping clustering (Wedel & Kamakura, 1998). When compared to other non-overlapping clustering methods, it appears to be more robust against outliers and is less afflicted by irrelevant variables or dimensions in the data (Punj & Stewart, 1983). It is also efficient in dealing with large data sets (Green, Carmone, & Kim, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%